Laserfiche WebLink
City of OR,ONO i <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. <br />29. The Ordinances, Comprehensive Plans and practical <br />situation which existed as of November 14, 1977, when <br />Resolution No. 851 was passed, has not changed with <br />respect to the reasons underlying the decision to <br />grant a lot width and lot area variance or to use line <br />D to C, as depicted on Exhibit A, as the lakeshore <br />setback line for the Rhode property. <br />30. That the part of line D to D to C represented by <br />"D to C" on Exhibit A to Resolution No. 851 does <br />not provide any greater protection foc the Bec-ker's <br />sight line of the lake than "D to D" extended all <br />the way across the Rhode property. <br />31. Line D to D, extended all the way across the Rhode <br />property, protects the Becker's sight line or view <br />of the lake. (See Finding No. 11 herein.) <br />The above findings of fact are in part based upon and dependent <br />upon the following findings of fact: <br />A. That the single family residential home is to be built <br />• in a location noted on Exhibit A attached hereto and <br />that prior to any construction that a survey be conducted <br />to ensure that the house is located as noted on Exhibit A <br />and that the City Zoning and Planning Administrator is <br />informed of the commencement of construction at least <br />24 hours prior thereto. <br />B. That there be only one dock allowed on the Rhode lot <br />which dock shall be no greater than 100 feet in length. <br />C. That on the Rhode lot either attached to the dock, moored <br />in front of the lot or tocated on the lot, there may not <br />be at any time more thanNthree watercraft, as defined by <br />Regulation 3.01, Subd. 13.of LMCD Regulations, either <br />docked, moored or stored. <br />d.clCx �` pYf �Ec �'TED <br />(b..4s. or <br />PAS;E 0F �� <br />