Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF A PLANNING COMNU SSICN MEETING HELD AUGUST 1, 1977 - PAGE 3 <br />Mr. Olson advised that Council had referred this item <br />back to the Cormiission for reconsideration. When <br />plicant was advised of this action, he informed the <br />ty office that because of prior commitments he would <br />not be able to attend this meeting. <br />}tassel moved, Dunlap seconded, to table this application <br />until the next meeting. Motion - Ayes (7), Nays (0). <br />The Asst. Zoning Administrator advised that preliminary <br />and final subdivision approval had been granted approx- <br />imately one year ago to this property. However, the <br />park dedication fee was never paid. Previous approval <br />was subject to a park dedication fee of $2,000 and <br />no lake access easement be given for Lot B. <br />Mr. Reardon was present. Commission reviewed final <br />proposal with applicant. Planning Commission advised <br />applicant that it would be necessary to record access <br />easements for Lot A through Lot B and that Lot B would <br />have no riparian rights. <br />Hassel moved, Guthrie seconded, to recommend final <br />subdivision approval as submitted subject to access <br />easements being recorded for Lot A through Lot B, <br />no riparian access for Lot B and a park dedication <br />fee of $2,000. rbtion - Ayes (7), Nays (0). <br />(I <br />The Asst. Zoning Administrator stated that Mr. Rhode <br />has submitted a new set of plans. fie has relocated <br />the house so that the lake edge of the house is in <br />line with the Becker house next door. The current <br />proposal has been moved back 35 ft. from the original <br />location. <br />Jack Rhode, -his architect Bob Peterson, and -builder <br />Jerry rluetzkow were present. Mr. Rhode explained that <br />he was withdrawing his request to use the existing <br />structure as a guest house. He is now proposing to <br />use this building for storage. In terms of the topo- <br />graphy of the land, he preferred the original proposal <br />and felt that moving the house farther back was a <br />merit of compromise. <br />Mr. Peterson advised that there would be more costs <br />involved with the current proposal because the <br />farther back you go on the lot the more fill it will <br />take. There would also be a problem with the grade. <br />Chairman McDonald felt that after visiting the site: <br />again this proposal had less of an impact to the Becker <br />operty because the side Mr. Becker's home affected <br />'may the proposal has no windows. This proposal also <br />appears to be more in line with the Becker home. <br />ROBERT F. WHITE <br />320 WOODHILL ROAD <br />VARIANCE - REAR YARD SE MCK <br />(#275) <br />LAURENCE REARDON <br />(PHILLIP DYKSTRA) <br />3080 NORTH SHORE DRIVE <br />SUBDIVISION (FINAL) <br />(# 73) <br />✓JACK R1i0DE <br />1410 BONS POINT ROAD <br />VARIANCE - LOT AREA T, WIDW <br />ODNDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />(N 210) <br />