Laserfiche WebLink
mvur-S OF A I'LNh 4ING 01111':!"$IIV IIL1.iINS ILELD X1,1l5T 1, 1977 - IAGE 3 <br />fir. Olson advised that Co1u►cil liad referred this item <br />hack to the Ccrarission for 1i•c,,nsideration. 1ti7.c•n <br />a})plicajit was advised of this action, he infor,-..,d the <br />ty office that because of prior commitr._�nts he w;»1ld <br />not be able to attend this meeting. <br />Ilassel r.oved, DMIap seconded, to 1a},1c this application <br />until the next meeting. A'htion - Ayos (7), Nays (0). <br />The Asst. Zoning .Acbninistrator advi!-.ed that preliminary <br />and final subdivision approval had hc.-n granted approx- <br />imately one ycar ago to this property. li�nticver, the <br />park dedication fee was never paid. i revious a1,p,roval <br />was subject to a park dedication fee of $2,000 „r1d <br />no lake access easement he given for Lot B. <br />Mr. Rca rdon was present. Co; rni ss ion Ivv i c-�.ed final <br />proposal with applicant. Planning Corunission a(h iscd <br />applicant that it would be necessary to record access <br />easements for Lot A through Lot B and that Lot B would <br />have no riparian rights. <br />Nassel moved, Guthrie seconded, to reco;cv,nd final <br />subdivision approval as submitted subject to access <br />easements being recorded for Lot A through Lot B, <br />no riparian ac..ess for Lot B and a park dedication <br />fee of $2,000. Wtion - Ayes (7), hays (0). <br />t <br />The Asst. Zoning Administrator stated that Mr. R1r)de <br />has submitted a new sex of plans. He has relocated <br />the hour so that the lake edge of the house is in <br />line with the Recker house next door. The current <br />proposal has been moved back 35 ft. from the original <br />location. <br />Jack mode, his architect Bob Peterson, and builder <br />Jerry Guetzkow were present. Mr. Rhode explained that <br />he was withdrawing his request to 1Lse the existing <br />structure as a guest house. lie is now proposing to <br />use this building for sto.age. In terms of the topo- <br />graphy of the land, he preferred the original proposal <br />and felt that moving the house farther hack was a <br />merit of compromise. <br />Mr. Peterson advised that there would be more costs <br />involved with the c111r('11t proposal because the <br />farther hack you go on the lot the more fill it will <br />take. There woild also he a problem with the grade. <br />(7-iairman Mrpot,..ld felt that after visiting the site <br />w ain this pro;io�,al had less of an impact to the Recker <br />perty because the side of 1-tr. Fecl.er's home affected <br />Lthe prolx)5al has no windows. This proposal also <br />appears to be more in ' ine with the Pec},er home. <br />ROBERT F. i•,NITE <br />320 1,r)- U LL i'')AD <br />VARINNCE - PFAR YAU SFFF <br />(0?75) <br />LAURENCE REAR" <br />(PHILLIP UYKSfRA) <br />3080 NOR 11i SH)RE DRIVE <br />SZ1RDlVISI(N (FINAL) <br />(# 73) <br />vSAa RHODE <br />1410 BOHNS POINT ROAD <br />VAR I ANCE - IAT AREA f WI DT <br />WNDITl(NAL USE PEMT <br />(# 210) <br />