Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

DESCRIPTIVE TERMINOLOGY PARTICLE SIZE IDENTIFICATION bu-"!ers over 3" Gravel Coat" I- 3- Modrum 112'' 1- Fine No. 4 1/2- Send Cosine No 4 - No 10 Medium No. 10 - No 40 Fine No 40 -- No. 100 Very Fine No 100 - No. 200 Silt No 200 - 005 mm any less than .005 min RELATIVE DENSITY OF COHESIONLESS SOIL.; very loose 0 4 BPF loose 5 10 BPF modum dense 11 30 BPF dense 31 50 BPF very dense 504 BPI, RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF GRAVEL SOIL INTRUSIONS THICKNESS lento 0 1 /8" seem 1 /B' 1 " lever 1" - 12'' varvod alternating seams or lenses of clays and silts in lake deposit MOISTURE CONTENT Dry Moist Wet Waterbearing CONSISTENCY OF COHESIVE SOILS less then 5% under optimum moisture over optimum moisture saturated sand very soft 0 1 BPF soft 2 3 HPF rather soft 4 5 BPI medium 6 - 8 BPF rather stiff 9 - 17 BPF stiff 13 - 16 BPF very stiff 11 - 30 HPF hard 30-0 BPF RELATIVE PROPORTIONS with a tow () - In % w th some 1 1 20'% with over 20% ORGANIC CONTENT 0 5% non to inghr,y o,gdn„ 6 10% slightly organ., 11 25% a, grin c 26 65 mink 65f peat PLASTICITY OF SOILS WITH LESS THAN 20% CLAY non plastic gritty, cannot thread %lightly plastic rough to %month hard to thread pier r smooth to wally. easy to thread LABORATORY TESTS a tract 0 5% DO Dry Density, pcf Organic Content. 94 a little 6 - 15% WD Wet Density. pcf ti Percent of Saturation. % soma 16 30% MC Natural Moisture Consent. '16 Specific Gravity and 31 - 50% LL Liquid L,m�t, % [ Cohesion PL Phut L.m.t, % 0 Angle of I e,nal Fiction PI Plesticity Index. % qu Unconf-, Comperssive Srrrngth DRILLING NOTES: Standard Pe,retretion test b,—oq% ,weir advanced by 2%" or Vio' I D hollow it,-,Ti 4�,,p is uo-P" r-oted tithi•, verse Jetting water bees used to clean cult auger prior to sampling only where indicated on logs Standard Isrnrtration test borings are cleslgnaled by the proton -ST- (Split Tube) Power sugar bormge ware advanced by a., or 6" diameter, continuous f6te. so;id stem augers So.l closvhcat,on r-d stista depths are inferred from disturbed samples sugared to the surfapo and are therefore somewhat approximate Pnwr, auger bo—gt .3re desrgnsted by the prefty "B" Hand p•obingt were advenceo manually with a 1'lo' diameter probe and ere limited to the depth from which the probe can be manually w,thdrawn Hand probrngs are indicated by the pref'N -H" CLASSIFICATION: Cla• sdicistion no togs is ",&Je by inspection on occorda,ice with the Unified Soils Classilic•anon System Isee attached chart) using visual manual procedures uMrss noted otherwise GROUND WATER Otxrrvations were madr at the times indicated Porosity of still %trots seasonal weather conditions %•te ropogrill etc trolly caUsr changes in the water levels indicated on the logs SAMPLING: An temples a,a taken w,ih the Ttandn,d 2 r) D split tube templef except wherF noted TW indicates thin vvn11 undVturbod temple SPFNumber% indicate hrowr. leer foot recorded in standard penetration lest, also known a% N vai a The sampler s set 6' into undisl.iibed %rri below the hollow stem outer Driving resistan sis are fhvn )unt►d if,, second rid third 6` mcremenis and si to get HPF Where they differ significantly, they are reported in the fnitr r.ng Im," 2f12 'of the second and third 6' increments respectively WH WH •odirates the, temple, ponefre+ed soil unryr we•ght of hammer and rods along. dewing not rettw rd NOTE All felts run in antordrirm with applicable ASTM standards Rmun ENEiM1EE11M1A TEStiTWO