My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-13-1987 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1987
>
04-13-1987 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2026 9:47:49 AM
Creation date
2/24/2026 9:41:45 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
199
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AARCH 16, 1987 <br />#1106 POTAS CONTINUED <br />It was moved by Taylor, secon(Ipd b; Johnson, :o <br />recommend approval as proposed with the modifiad <br />hardcover noting that the average setback encr.oacnni,.nt. <br />does not have a significant impact of the neighbors' <br />views. Motion, Ayes 2, Nays 5. Motion fails. <br />It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Cohen, to <br />deny Application #1106. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 2. Taylor <br />and Johnson voted nay. <br />Chairman Kelley and Bellows indicated that they would <br />consider a modified plan of deck only, no structure. <br />#1110 ROBERT 14ARTINSON <br />1840 SHORELINE DRIVE <br />VARIANCES <br />SECOND REVIEW <br />Robert Martinson was present for this matter.. <br />Zoning Administrator explained the request ;.or average <br />lakeshore setback variance for accessory structures: <br />1) Wooden deck at grade (railing not required), 30' <br />in front of average setback line. <br />2) _ .31/paved area at. grade 60' in front of average <br />setback line. <br />Lot area and iot width variances are als, requested. <br />She noted that applicant no longer F;eeks a side setback <br />variance for the principal -3tructure. She also noted <br />that the City code does not require o fence around a <br />swimming pool nor does the applicant's insurance company <br />require it However, applicant is permitted to put a 3- <br />1/2' _ence within the lakeshore yard up 1) the 75' <br />lakeshore setback line. <br />Mr. Martinson state3 that he ortacted adjac?nt property <br />owner Alden Anderson, 1.830 Shoreline Drive, who <br />expressed concern that the Clty would grant variances <br />to area & width when they denied a similar request. <br />Mabusth explained his request. involved rural lots held <br />under common ownership. Mr. Anderson was not present for <br />this meetin- Mr. Martinson stated that Mr. Anderson <br />appeared to ;ve no problem with his proposal, or the <br />affects or, his property. <br />7�ninq Adi,, r strator Mabuf=th noted that the -)then <br />adjacent property owner, Pauline Bouchard, 1860 <br />Shnreline Drive, contacted the City offices to advise of <br />tier complete approval of the site development plan. <br />Then, were no (. mmvrits from the public. <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.