Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - PUBLIC HEARING <br />HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR STUDY/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT <br />4. Area E - Vineyard of the Lake Church is in the area, and the other <br />property has just been approved for a day care center. One <br />requirement for the center, which has been addressed, is the building <br />must be sprinkled and in order for this to be done .a 500 GPM pump <br />would have to be placed in the ground, which is very costly. It would <br />be cheaper for them to extend utilities from Long Lake than to put in <br />the pump. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson noted the other sewer line, Maple <br />Plain/Long Lake Interceptor which was put in during 1985, is a force main <br />which runs through the corridor. Initially, the City of Orono was in <br />opposition to the placement of that pipe because it was felt there may be <br />capacity in the line for additional units for Orono, however, once the line <br />was in place, actual hydraulics provided little if any extra capacity. <br />There is a possiblity that the City could put in up to 50 units in that <br />line past Old Crystal Bay Road, but probably not over that number. It is <br />into this line that the Fulmer property will be tapping. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />Mrs. Cici, owner of 875 Wayzata Boulevard, noted that the <br />property propoued for the day care center in Area E would like to have the <br />Long Lake utilities extended to the property because of the following <br />reasons: <br />1. It will be very costly otherwise because of the wetlands on the <br />area. This cost would have to be passed on the the parents utilizing <br />the day care center. <br />2. The well water would have to be tested periodically for <br />contamination, and municipal water wou.d propose no health hazards. <br />3. If at a later date the City of Orono would propose sewer and water <br />in this area, the septic system and well could no longer be u•ced <br />anyway. <br />Howard Eisinger, owner of a parcel of property in Area C, asked <br />his ability to connect to the trunk line for his property. The lard has <br />been tested for on -site sewage systems and it did not pass the perculation <br />testing. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson noted that sewer currently it not <br />being proposed for that area. He asked for a letter of the pert results <br />for that property. <br />Chairman Kelley moved onto Parcel 1, noting that a loop road is <br />being proposed with on -septic systems. His comment was that he did not <br />feel the property should be reviewed for a loop road at this time, and it <br />should be left at 2 acre residential. <br />No other comments were made for this are,.. <br />