03-30-1987 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CITY OF OROVO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - PUBLIC HEARING HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR STUDY/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT Scheme 1. Remote frontage road with a consolidated strip center with no direct ac^_-as onto Highway 12. There are some free-standing commercial pads between the frontage road and Highway 12, with access of frontage to town houses. All alternatives given call for the retention of the wetlands and trees on the site. The area to the north, as shown, is subdivided into single family lots with not a great deal of support for increase of density. Scheme 2. All free-standing commercial pads along the frontage road, then transitional multiple residential back to single family residential. The only real difference between this and Scheme 1 is the consolidation of the commercial potential into a single major center in the middle of the corridor in Scheme 1. Scheme 3. Commerci.1 lreas would be limited to the areas which are between a single facing frontage road and Highway 12 on both sides, again with transitional multiple family back to single family residential to the north. Scheme 4. Limits the commercial area to the northeast quadrant of Crystal Bay Road and Highway 12 then transitional to multi -residential and back to single family residential to the north. Mr. Shardlow noted it was the consensus of the Council, that if the performance standards could be met and if appropriate sewer capacity could be identified, any ofte of the above alternatives could be feasible. Planning Commission Questions Chairman Kelley verified the def nition of one sewer unit as serving a single household. He questioned what was the original section of land which was assessed for sewer. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the original sewered area was to the south and west of Highway 12, the school area and the industrial area. He clarified that no sewer units were allocated to Area No. 4 and 5 with the exception of the Oronc Shopping Center and part of Area No. 1. Bernhardson noted that the remaining 116 sewer units should be allocated to the original area that was assessed. He stated that the City could have a maximum allocation of 600 units (116 included in that number) which would require a minin.um of two changes and pcssibly the third: 1. Addition of a 1,000 GPM pump at Long Lake 2. Pipe C (800 foot segment) changed by adding a parallel pipe or a larger pipe to replace the current pipe Pipe E - possibly requiring a change City Administrator Bernhardson noted that with the existing interceptor may still be take capacity in this area over and above the additional 600 units for this area, but there currently is not a prepared pump space available ap:.,t from the one that is proposed to be used.