My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-30-1987 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1987
>
03-30-1987 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2026 12:57:44 PM
Creation date
2/23/2026 12:54:44 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
287
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
zoning File 01112 <br />March 11, 1987 <br />Page 4 <br />Staff Cosaments regarding Application /1112 - <br />Staff has received no written comments for this application from the new <br />owners of the marina, now referred to as Smith Bay Marina, Inc. As in our <br />sketch plan review, the three previous owners of Sailors World Inc. plan to <br />lease the property and operate a boat sales/repair operation. From the <br />site plan submitted for this review, the applicants do not plan to keep <br />boats on the site. Parking is provided for passenger vehicles only. It is <br />staff's understanding that the owner of Smith Bay Marina has also purchased <br />the former Chaska Marine, now referred to as the Maxwell Bay Marina. A <br />major part of the operation for that marina has always been boat repair and <br />sales. It may be that the Sailor World group will function as a satellite <br />operation - this should be made clear. <br />It is staff's position that the .26 acre site is too limited to sustain the <br />dual operation. The boat sales operation would have less of an impact than <br />a repair operation. The storage of boats even for a limited period of time <br />while awaiting repairs would create major problems for this severely <br />limited site. If we are dealing with a satellite operation or a support <br />facility for the Mamiell Bay operation, there may be other innovative ways <br />to deal with the site. Remember the parking lot to the north may not be <br />realized if Council also denies the parking lot amendment. As the City <br />attorney advised, the City cannot create a "new" non -conforming use on a <br />property. <br />With the absence of support material from the agents who plan to lease the <br />property, the City staff would still recommend approval of a singular <br />(preferably boat sales) use or a support sate! 1 ite operation of the <br />property that would limit boat repairs to an off -site facility. If this is <br />not the case, the site plan is incomplete - where are boats to be <br />temporarily stored awaiting repairs. <br />Review of Commercial Site Plan - <br />A. Access. The City engineer recommends removal of access onto County Road <br />1-5 limiting access to site from Spates Avenue (central on site plan). <br />Access to an adjacent parking area is premature until Council completes <br />review of ordinance amendment. The parking plan would have to be amended <br />to allow a driveway aisle with clear access to all designated parking <br />stalls from the single access. <br />B. Parking Needs. Area of structure 1170 a.f. <br />T) Per standards (Section 10.41 Subdivision 5B) <br />8 stalls required <br />2) Per Section 10.61 Subdivision 10 C - Retail Sales and Service <br />Establishments <br />1 stall per 150 s.f, of net floor area <br />1170 -- 150 - 7.8 or 8 stalls <br />There is no specific standard for a residential district regarding <br />commercial uses - staff recommends using the standard for the <br />principal use (sales and service center). Tn this specific case, 8 <br />stalls would also be required for commercial/retail use in the 9-2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.