My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bohns Point Road
>
1535 Bohns Point Road - 08-117-23-44-0025
>
Land Use
>
14-3646, Prelim Plat
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/19/2026 2:49:11 PM
Creation date
2/19/2026 2:47:46 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Tuesday, January 21, 2014 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />Acting Chair Landgraver closed the public hearing at 7:33 p.m. <br />Schoenzeit commented it is an improvement over what was proposed the first time. <br />Landgraver stated the one concern he has relates to the grading between the two houses that are adjoining <br />Lot 2 and the down slope. Landgraver stated in his view it app~arslike a lot of soil is being moved, <br />which would create an unnatural looking ravine on the south side.. · <br />Stickney stated the person that owns that land is his client and tha(he is aware ofwlll:lt is being proposed <br />and has seen all the plans. Stickney stated given the:size of the lots,Jhey do have some room~o move <br />everything, but that approving a plan like this gives the new property owner the ability to .construct <br />something without going through the whole process over again. · <br />Landgraver asked where the lakeshore setback on the north $ide is located; <br />Curtis pointed out the average lakeshore setback line. Curti$ stated the line is b~sed on the lot as it exists <br />today. · <br />Stickney noted the property to the north is ctirrently for sal~. <br />Land graver stated if the properties haye separate .ownersithere migl,lt be some variations in the grading <br />plan and it could result in a gradingplatfthafis not M sytnmetr~cal find smooth. <br />I , , . • <br />Stickney stated there are no plans atthis· time to build on either lot but there may be plans down the road. <br />Stickney stated if the averageJakeshore setback line is changed, Lot 2 would have to change accordingly. <br />Lemke commented that would likely be the worst case scenario given the size of the lots. <br />Curtis ~oted the City Engineersl!ggested there be i11dependent grading plans in case there are two <br />different property owners. •. · <br />L,a~dgrav~r asked what the nextstep~ould be in the application process. <br />. . <br />Curtis stated the application would gotb the City Council at one of their February meetings with a <br />preliminary platr~solution drafted for .their review and potential approval. <br />Lemke moved, McGrann seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. 14-3646, George <br />Stickney on behalf of J)NA. Properties, LLC, 1535 Bohns Point Road, granting of preliminary plat <br />approval, subject to City Engineer and Staff recommendations. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />McGrann asked if there is a setback from the lagoon. <br />Curtis stated there is a lakeshore setback and noted the average lakeshore setback line is ahead of that. <br />Page 12 of 26
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.