My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bohns Point Road
>
1535 Bohns Point Road - 08-117-23-44-0025
>
Land Use
>
14-3646, Prelim Plat
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/19/2026 2:49:11 PM
Creation date
2/19/2026 2:47:46 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Tuesday, January 21, 2014 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />natural and not contrived. The Planning Commission should also determine whether or not the suggested <br />building pads will accommodate homes at an elevation and with a foundation style which is compatible <br />with the adjacent properties. <br />The subject property is located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area and sewer service is available <br />to these properties. There are two existing sewer stubs currently servirtithe property and are aligned in <br />such a way that each of the proposed lots can utilize the existing stubs. · <br />Planning Staff recommends approval of the subdivis~on. <br />Schoenzeit asked what the grade change is in feet. <br />Curtis indicated Exhibit C shows the cross-section. Curtis stated on th~ south lot along the swale, the pre- <br />existing home on the property was quite large and it is not k,.iown what the grades were prior to <br />construction of that home. <br />Schwingler asked if the Planning Commissionlias reviewed this application pre,vi~usly. <br />Curtis indicated it has but that the approval :has t:xpired, <br />McGrann asked if any public comments have Qeen received on this.application. <br />,·' ', ' ' ·' :' '' j <br />Curtis indicated Staff has not received l:lll)'. <br />,· <br />George Stickney, Applicant, st~teahe 'Was asked by tlie sellers to develop this land. The property owner <br />appeared before the Planning Commission previously for a three lot subdivision. The property owner <br />never finalized their pl~ns and never filed the final plat. <br />Stickney stated the lagoon is unique, and with it being split, it made it almost impossible to market. <br />Stickney stated in his view, if they doubled the size of the lot, it would be in keeping with the area and <br />woµfd allow for one lot to have the whole lagoon: <br />Stickney indicated he has attempted to.put the grades together to blend in with the adjoining properties <br />and allow for.a small walkout on,each M the lots. Stickney stated in his view the lots are oversized <br />enough to allowfor some leeway on the grading and building pad. Stickney noted this is a one acre <br />zoning area and bothJots are over two acres. Stickney stated drainage should not affect either adjoining <br />property and.thatfre hasnotheard~ny negative comments from the neighbors. <br />Land graver asked if any of the neighbors have asked to see the plat. <br />Stickney indicated they have not but they do know what is being proposed. <br />Schwingler commented the application is pretty straight forward. <br />Acting Chair Landgraver opened the public hearing at 7:33 p.m. <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br />Page 11 of 26
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.