Laserfiche WebLink
:1It:UTE3 OF Tili: PLAIMEAG LOM;4ISSI3N !1L•'ETING HELD OCTO3'..a 20, 1986 <br />J lJ 3© MCDOWELL CONTINUED <br />:Ar. Buryer previously statvu how this rezoning would <br />solve his problem noting that he moved to this area for <br />the sa+ie reasons as the others, howevt:r he had a <br />philosophy of life being that this country was not made <br />for only him and that others deserved the right to enjoy <br />and live in this area. <br />Mr. Burger noted that the proposed lots actually will be <br />close to five acres including wetlands. He also noted <br />the issue of the impending sewer line in the Stubbs Bay <br />area. <br />Attorney "om Humphrey stater that the proposed rezoning <br />was consistent with the existing surrounding areas <br />noting tnat there is a natural barrier that would serve <br />as a dividing line between the proposed rezoning area <br />anv.i the more rura- area tv the west. <br />Goetten asked Zon: ng Administrator ;labusth the reason <br />that area was origi,ially zoned 5 acre. Additionally, <br />she state] `hat she wou l;] like staff to compile a lot <br />size comparison, and would like a t,-pography map to <br />refer to. <br />Zoning Administrator 1411,usth state) t1-;at the 1974 <br />Comprehensive Plan did not. clairfy the reasons for the 5 <br />acres zone. <br />McDonald stated that the reason for the 5 acre zoning is <br />because Stubbs Bay is a critical area in which the soils <br />are sensitive anJ 5 acres are needed to support a <br />septic system. She had concerns regarding where the <br />rezoning would step. She is totally opposed to this <br />request. <br />aellows stated that she felt there were more issues to <br />be considered, but felt the developers are not proposing <br />1/2 acre lots nor are t v developing the area without <br />first substantiating it �:h tests and facts. <br />Zoning Administrator Ma.)usth noted that there is a <br />potential sewer project planned in Stubbs Bay. <br />Chairman Kelley stated that he felt more facts should be <br />submitted for review before making a recommendation. <br />Present representing the Department of Natural Resources <br />was Land Specialist Jim Bloomendahl. He r.otei that the <br />in this instance, the DN:2 does not regulate this <br />particular wetlan,i area. He additionally requested some <br />facts rLigart"ing this a,,pliLat. ►,.)n. <br />