Laserfiche WebLink
MTNUTES OF A PLANNTNG COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON .,ANUARY 28, 1980 <br />The Planning Commission met on the above. date. Present ATTENDANCE <br />were the following members: Chairman Wilson, Adams, 7:30 P.M. <br />Hammerel and Jabbour. Mabusth represented the City st,eff.. <br />Mabusth advised the Planning Lommission that their PAUL SCHF.RBER <br />recommendation was sought concerning the realignment 1420 Bohns Pt. <br />of the south property line for the Scherber eubdi, ision. ,U,BpZTON <br />The State Building Code requires a minimal 3' setback (�508) <br />from the property lino Gefnre structural modifications <br />are required. The Orono Zoning Code requires a 10' <br />setback for accessory structures. Mabusth noted that <br />the proposed plan did show a setback for the garage of <br />10' and the shed and ,fence were setback 3' from the <br />property line. Dave Carlson, representing the applicant, <br />reviewed Mr. Scherber's position. Mabusth noted for the <br />record Mr. Solomonson's letter in which he states that <br />he would abide with any decision the Council deems <br />necessary. <br />Frahm arrived. 7:40 P.M. <br />Adams moved to recommend approval of the proposed lot <br />line realignment as a reasonable solution in consideration <br />of the other alternatives; to approve the creation of <br />Outlot A allowing a 3' setback from the encroaching shed, <br />under the express condition that Scherber will transfer <br />Outlot A to Mr. Solomonson. Outlot A must be legally <br />combined with Mr. Solomonson's residential lot. It <br />should be noted that the setback created b) this sub- <br />division is unique to that shed. Motion seconded b- <br />Hacmaerel. Vote: Ayes (5) , Nays (0) . Motion passed <br />unanimously. <br />Wilson noted for the record that the ex.sting condition <br />was not a result of Scherber's doing and that the <br />maximum required of Scherber by the Planning Commission <br />was a 3' setback but that the Council han the option <br />to leave the lot line as is anJ require the removal <br />of the shed. <br />Mr. Haefele and Mr. Martin were present. Mabusth R. HAEFELE <br />reviewed for the applicants the responses from Hennepin E. MARTIN � R. <br />County Highway Department and the Public works Director. HASSEL <br />The Planning Commission was to determine if the area of Navarre Ln <br />Navarre Lane to be vacated although no longer used as a VACATION <br />public roadway still involved any put,lic interest. (1528) <br />