Laserfiche WebLink
FILE# 07-3279 <br />12 April 2007 <br />Page 4 of 4 <br />appear very much as one building. Considering the location of the closest adjacent <br />property owner to the proposed building( s) the Planning Commission may want to <br />consider requiring an additional setback from the property owner to the west. Similarly, <br />the applicant has a considerable amount of acreage, and perhaps an additional setback <br />from the rear lot line is appropriate as well. Additionally, in light of the mainland <br />regulations regarding accessory building sizes and the applicant's property area, staff <br />finds that it may be reasonable to allow construction of a 2,000 s.f. building on the <br />applicant's property. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. In reference to the RS requirements regarding accessory buildings, does the <br />Planning Commission feel that the number of additional accessory buildings on <br />the property should be reduced? <br />2. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Planning Staff recommends approval of a variance to allow a single 2,000 s.f. building to <br />be constructed on the property with any additional conditions the Planning Commission <br />deems appropriate. <br />4