My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-09-1987 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1987
>
02-09-1987 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/3/2026 1:29:35 PM
Creation date
2/3/2026 1:22:54 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
670
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Fuedieg Alternatives <br />Definition: Funding alternatives includes mechanisms for both changing the <br />structure of the LMCD and altering the present mechanisms for fund- <br />ing physical improvements on the lake and lakeshore. <br />Background: <br />During the course of the interviews with representatives of interested govern- <br />mental agencies, there was a general agreement that some form of new funding <br />mechanism was necessary for the LMCD and/or paying for improving or adding rec- <br />reational developments. Additionally, the 1985 Task Force •ecnmmended that al- <br />ternative strategies be examined by the LMCD. However, during the inn we, <br />not all key informants agreed that a change was necessary. <br />Several alternative funding mechanisms were suggested. During development of <br />the plan the existing funding mechanism needs to be evaluated in light of <br />alternatives. <br />Issues Identified <br />1. One alternative for funding boating safety is to increase the boat- <br />ing safety fund (state) and to increase the allocation to active <br />agencies on Lake Minnetonka. <br />2. LMCD could raise its fees for permits, marina fees and other develop- <br />,nent and commercial use fees. <br />7. Several key informants believe that 9 special fee for use of either <br />metropolitan lake% or only Lake Minnetonka should be levied to off- <br />set the cost of public access to the lake. <br />4. Some key informants and the 19B5 Task Force believe that the LMCb <br />levy limit should be outside of the 14 municipality limit%. <br />5. The opportunity for state funding needs to be examined because it <br />the special nature of Lake Minnetonka. <br />6. ' informants expressed a:: interest in examining the possible for- <br />m, n of : special tax district for the LMCD. <br />7. Seve.ei key informant. cited the difficulty of adding outside funds <br />to the Sheriff's budget; the fund% .ometia,. are not necessarily ap- <br />plied as intended. Supplying equipment seem, to he more reliable- <br />B. watershed District can be expected I) hay.• lays ability t) enforce <br />and munrtnr it% pr•)grams, which ha% direct impliratien. for Lake <br />Minuet ,nka. <br />work f:l+a.• s for r :e Plan <br />rn+ conc�, .r •Ili! <br />I fRl".I - , •') 'Ic a L9M✓ ltnnof OL Yd 11(✓r1 Yn YA ippl) .) ar <br />- �;Ir i>s, nr tr) %el e•[ed as•r ;r ,u p9. <br />2. r.. :. ., r .1er4/1 boat IIr.nY,. I—. far I;.. v- 'opoltten <br />,tat. li<en... 1..+ nwr g:,•: '.a<k t) Ilk. <br />;r-., - I: 4n.1y9i. of the alter Mtiae 9v chsni ws for <br />E andln;Y:9w ......r.•m of ,n ,. Ink.'a .,I, face a% presented in the <br />I4d1 w• '')rr, Rep.)rt. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.