My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-09-1987 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1987
>
02-09-1987 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/3/2026 1:29:35 PM
Creation date
2/3/2026 1:22:54 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
670
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OP 771E PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JANUARY 20, 19137 <br />41097 VAN EECKHOUT BLDG. CORP. CONTINUED <br />Planning Commission felt the cost involve-�.nould be the <br />applicant's responsibility. <br />It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by loylor, to <br />recommend approval of the lot line rearrangement at <br />2020/2080 Salem Court, vacation of drainage a..d utility <br />easement and creation of new drainage and utility <br />easement along the property line as proposed, further <br />with the condition that the current utilities on 2020 <br />Salem Court serving 2080 Salem Court be relocated within <br />the property they serve. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />i1096 J. VOGT AND M. 11 ;BLT� I <br />95/175 WATERTOWN ROAD <br />SUBDIVISION <br />PUBLIC HEARING 7:45 - 8:04 <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing <br />was noted. <br />1. ke Hilbelink and John Vogt were present for this <br />matter. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained the proposed <br />subdivision involves the replat of Lots 2 and 3 Peterman <br />Addition which was approv 1 by the City 11/10/86. The <br />new proposal involves the creation of 4 additional lots <br />with total development at 6 lots. Each lot sati,-*ies <br />the area and width standards. There are no exi . 9 <br />structures on the property. She noted that drai:..y� .s <br />an important issue in this matter. She noted that City <br />Engineer Cook recommends tLat a drainage ditch be <br />installed al•tng the west lot lines of Lots 1 and 2 in <br />order to prevent drainage fr:.. east to drain into <br />adjacent property. Cook asks the he drainage ditch be <br />defined along Lots 1 and 2 prior to lot development and <br />that as lots to the north are developed any drainage to <br />went be channeled to drainage ditch along west lot <br />lines. She noted that all the lots meet the standards <br />and are suitable for primary and alternate on -site <br />se -tic systems. <br />Bill Wear stated that lie felt the entire drainage ditch <br />should be constructed at this time <br />Mr. Hilbelink felt that the de ..opment of t^.e lots <br />would not affect the Arainage pattern that has existed <br />for many years. <br />Joe Sawchuk stated he felt he ^-ainage should be <br />designed for the suture and carried along the entire <br />subdivision. <br />N <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.