My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-12-1987 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1987
>
01-12-1987 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2026 10:23:39 AM
Creation date
2/2/2026 10:14:02 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
366
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1093 <br />December 5, 1986 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />2. Septic testing for Lots 2 and 4. Staff has reviewed the septic testing <br />for all lots ar..1 finds that both primary and alternate sites are provided. <br />The sites on Lot 4 have been verified as to exact location on the slope, <br />and are acceptable. A third site on Lot 2 has been tested and the original <br />alternate site on Lot 2 has been revised and both are suitable for mound <br />systems. The northeasterly alternate site on Lot 2 is most suitable due to <br />its relatively flat slope, noting that this site would be detrimentally <br />affected if the basin was ever to be dammed to become a pond or wetland, <br />he:,ce no such land alteration would ever be allowed without a careful <br />conditional use permit review. <br />3. Access to County Road 6. Planning Commisson recommended approval for <br />the private roadway as proposed, on the basis that the City apparently has <br />no legal right to force the Tanglewood Homeowners to allow a connection to <br />their private roa,1. The Tanglewood Homeowners object to the connection. <br />In subsequent discussions with Hennepin County, the County has stated <br />that tht y would approve this new road access for. P & A Investments on a <br />temporary basis, with the long-term goal of having one access serving both <br />"Knoll Manor" nd Tanglewood. On 12/5/86, Dave Zetterstrom of Hennepin <br />County Departm_ t of Transportation verified that due to sight distance and <br />topography, the Knoll Manor location is a better access than Tanglewood. <br />Staff would present 4 access options for Council to consider: <br />a) Approve the proposal as -is with no consideration for a future <br />shared road entrance. <br />b) Accept the developer's cuggesti.on to create a widened private road <br />outlot abutting Tanglewood to pi o.'ide space for a future access road <br />link connecting one road to th` ctner, but not stipulating when or how <br />that connection wi 11 occur, or ','io wi l l be financially responsible for <br />the connection. <br />c) Create an outlot connecting Tanglewood Road to Knoll Manor Road, <br />requiring that the Tanglewood access be closed and the link <br />constructed at P & A's expense because their development is making the <br />Tanglewood access less safe. <br />d) Create an outlot connecting Knoll Manor to Tanglewood, removing <br />the existing driveway at 1380 County Road 6. P & A would again be <br />expected to bear the costs. This proposal has been re;ected by the <br />Tanglewood people who do not want more traffic on their road. <br />Staff recommends, from a planning standpoint, that Option C is the <br />most appropriate, realizinu that there may be much resistance from the <br />Tanglewood homeowners and realizing there would be additional up -front <br />costs to P & A. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.