Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD NOVEMBER 16, 1992 <br />(#4) <br />A) #1785 DAVID CARLSON, <br />600/610/620 BIG ISLAND - <br />PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION, CLASS II, LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT & <br />CREATION OF EASEMENT <br />B) #1781/#1782 -620 BIG ISLAND -VARIANCE/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />C) #1783/#1784 -610 BIG ISLAND -VARIANCE/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />PUBLIC HEARING 9:21 -9:39 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Pub Ii cation and Certificate of Mai i ng were noted. <br />David Car I son was present for this app I i cation. <br />Mabusth explained at the time the survey was done for the property <br />owners of 600 (Lot 3) and 610 (Lot 2) became aware that they did <br />not own the lakeshore that they historically had been using. Mr. <br />Carlson then asked them to participate in a lot I ine rearrangement <br />to correct the riparian issue and other mutua I I y benefiting I ot <br />I ine adjustments. Any approval of the lot I ine rearrangement must <br />address the proposed substandard side setback of the existing cabin <br />on Lot 2. Applicant has adv i sed the structure wi 11 be removed. She <br />noted both new structures wi 1 1 be located in the f l oodplain , as are <br />the existing structures. Because the areas of both seasonal cabins <br />are over 800 s.f. in area, an on-site septic system will be <br />required. The subdivision code requires anytime a private or pub I i c <br />easement is created, subdivision approval is necessary. Easements <br />wi I I be provided for Lots 1 and 2 sharing the septic system. <br />Be I I ows noted the I arge I oft space proposed for the new cabin and <br />the potential for bedroom usi expansion. <br />Mabusth stated covenants would have to be executed to restrict the <br />use of the cabin to a two bedroom use. <br />Carlson said because of the cost and the value of the land, he felt <br />the size of the structure was warranted. <br />Kelley stated the Commission is concerned with the preservation of <br />the land and the lake and could not consider monetary concerns . <br />Car I son indicated the subdivision has been proposed to meet the <br />setback and hardcover requirements. He said he has proposed to go <br />up instead of out to meet that criteria. He added the loft area <br />wi 11 be used as a play area for his children. He noted he has <br />eliminated al I the problems in the area but the encroachment of the <br />floodplain and the need for an average setback var i ance. <br />1 3