My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-08-1986 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1986
>
12-08-1986 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2026 10:06:34 AM
Creation date
1/27/2026 9:56:06 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
370
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1074 <br />September 10, 1986 <br />Page 3 <br />4) Area - the sign exceeds the allowed area by a 375% <br />variance. Once again, staff seeks Planning Commission <br />input - are you aware of any other commercial -like <br />signs in residential zones that reach these standards <br />for area? <br />Staff recommends that the Grace Baptist Church be advised to <br />install the "standard" model sign and recommend approval of the <br />following variances: <br />1. Height Variance <br />Required = 8' <br />Existing = 10' or 125% <br />Proposed = 17' or 213% <br />2. Area Variance <br />Required = 12 s.f. <br />Existing = ? <br />Proposed = 30 s.f. or 2.50% <br />Approval is based on the following findings: <br />1. The 17' sign is more consistent with previous commercial -like <br />signs approved for residential zones. <br />2. The sign will not interfere with the functioning of traffic <br />signals or signage nor pose hazards for users of public roadways. <br />3. The church has had a sign in excess of required standards <br />within the street yard for several years without any reports of <br />problems. <br />4. The unique shape of the lot and the location of the church <br />building in relation to the approved height and proposed location <br />of the sign wi 11 serve to lessen the impact of such structure. <br />Additional Comments and Planning Commission Recommendation: <br />December 3, 1986 <br />Additional Exhibits <br />Exhibit G - Herald I Sign Model <br />Exhibit H - Planning Commission Minutes of 9/15/86 <br />The applicant resubmitted a second signage plan (Exhibit G) per <br />the directives of the Planning Commission at their first review. The <br />sign was to be trimmed back in height and to concentrate on "lower and <br />larger" reader boards (Exhibit H) as applicant advised the church had <br />a definite need for additional space to provide a readable message, <br />schedule of services and church name. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.