Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1093 <br />December 5, 1986 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />2. Septic testing for Lots 2 and 4. Staff has reviewed the septic testing <br />for all lots and finds that both primary and alternate sites are provided. <br />The sites on Lot 4 have been verified as to exact location on the slope, <br />and are acceptable. A third site on Lot 2 has been tested and the original <br />alternate site on Lot 2 has been revised and both are suitable for mound <br />systems. The northeasterly alternate site on Lot 2 is most suitable due to <br />its relatively flat slope, noting that this site would be detrimentally <br />affected if the bas'_n was ever to be dammed to become a pond or wetland, <br />hence no such land alteration would ever be allowed without a careful <br />conditional use permit review. <br />3. Access to County Road 6. Planning Comm_sson recommended approval for <br />the private roadway as proposed, on the basis that the City apparently has <br />no legal right to force the Tanglewood Homeowners to allow a connection to <br />their private road. The Tanglewood Homeowners object to the connection. <br />In subsequent discussions with Hennepin County, the County has stated <br />that they would approve this new r ad access for P & A Investments on a <br />temporary basis, with the long-term goal of having one access serving both <br />"Knoll Manor" and Tanglewood. On 12/5/86, Dave Zetterstrom of Hennepin <br />County Department of Transportation verified that due to sight distance and <br />topography, the Knoll Manor location is a better access than Tanglewood. <br />Staff would present 4 access options Council to consider: <br />a) Approve the proposal as -is with i consideration for a future <br />shared road entrancF <br />b) Accept the developer's suggestion to create a widened private road <br />outlot abutting Tanglewood to provide space for a future access road <br />link connecting one road to the other, but not stipulating when or how <br />that connection will occur, or who will be financially responsible for <br />the connection. <br />c) Create an outlot connecting Tanglewood Road to Knoll Manor Road, <br />requiring that the Tanglewood access be closed and the link <br />constructed at P & A's expense because their development is making the <br />Tanglewood access less safe. <br />d) Create an outlot connr ting Knoll Manor to Tanglewood,' removing <br />the existing dri eway at �80 County Road 6. P & A would ay in r;e <br />expected to bear the v.,sts This proposal has been rejected a <br />Tanglewood people who do no want more traffic on their road. <br />Staff recommends, from a planning standpoint, that Option C is 1� e <br />most appropriate, realizing th,-it: there may be much resistance from t..e <br />Tanglewood Homeowners and reaIi,%ing there would be additional up -front <br />costs to P & A. <br />