My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 4584
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 4500 - 4599 (July 10, 2000 - January 22, 2001)
>
Resolution 4584
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2015 11:30:59 AM
Creation date
11/17/2015 11:30:59 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�� <br /> � O� . <br /> � O O <br /> ��6. - CITY of ORONO <br /> � � <br /> �� G'� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL � . <br /> ��kEsTrI�4�' � • NO. � � � �: <br /> case would be the north property line. Staff would recommend <br /> approval of a variance to the 35' setback to the alley, and require a <br /> 10' setback be maintained based on the followinQ hardship: the alley <br /> has historically provided access to the propert�-; the City does not <br /> intend to develop or maintain the alley; the alley �•ould continue to be <br /> used privately by the o�vners of the propet�� for dri�•eway purposes; the <br /> north property line would function as side, interior lot line; a 10' <br /> standard setback would be appropriate in this case, and would be in <br /> keeping with the intent of the zoning ordinance and Comprehensive <br /> Plan; and requiring a 35' setback would not a11oR• a suitable building <br /> site on what has historically been a residentiall�- developed property, <br /> and would move construction of the house closer to the lakeshore <br /> which is not in the best interests of water qualit�- and protecting lake <br /> views for adjacent properties. <br /> * 4. The City Council finds that the conditions elistinJ on this property are <br /> peculiar to it and do not apply generally to ocher property in this zonin� <br /> district; that granting the variances would not ad�-ersely affect tra�c <br /> conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other dan�er to neighboring <br /> property; would not merely serve as a convenience to Lhe applicants, but is <br /> necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulry; is necessary to <br /> preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in <br /> keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan <br /> of the City. � <br /> 5. The City Council has considered this application includin� the findings and <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports b�- City staff, comments <br /> . by the appTicants and the effect of the proposed ��ariance on the health, safety. <br /> � and welfare of the community. � <br /> � <br /> � � Page 3 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.