Laserfiche WebLink
"There is nothing particularly wrong with this trend," Carlson stated. "Special <br />assessments are not popular, but neither are property taxes. Most communities <br />a -ying to strike the proper balance between these two revenue sources." <br />In the growing sub i, Carlson st , the choice between property taxes and spe- <br />cial assessments is .ometimes dicta,ed by state law. "The legislature imposed <br />limits on local property tax levie• 1 1971," he explained. "Growing Suburbs <br />quickly bump into these limits as t•.y make the capital improvements that grown: <br />requires." <br />Metropolitan municila, are raising about as much pro•erty tax reve,,,.e ouL- <br />side the levy limitf. as Jr, them, C'-rlscn said. Not only are special <br />assessments excluded from the levy li ,ts, he said, but levies of metropolitan <br />transit, airport and waste control agencies are also excluded. <br />"Property taxes and the general obligation bonds teat are backed by property <br />value spread the cost of ci,y services ac-oss all residential, commercial and <br />industrial properties," Carlson stated. ;pecial assessments assign the cr-t of <br />services directly to the immediata beneficiar:es. <br />"Whlc,, syscc.J is fairer? What balance is appropriate for a given city 'hes^ <br />are crucial questions," Carlson said. "The levv limit introduce an ar .icial <br />and unnecessary barrier to a rational search for answers." <br />C :lson said that municipal dF , bo'' fr•.;t;Aneral obligation bonds and special <br />assessment bond:;, appears manageible. "Debt r•t-rvice as a percent o: current <br />rev,:nua varied all he way from zero to 318 ;.ercent, but the range isn't as <br />broad as it appears," C-Arlson e.cplsined. <br />"We have three debt -free cr. cities: Bayport. Inuependence and North Oaks," h_ <br />said. "North Oaks pent nc ig n- capital improvement,- in 1985, arc' the other <br />two spent very little. These ar- al., sttblE communities w:ch good manageme;:_ <br />and a light dem,^^d for city pro;,ided services." <br />Ca lson said the 318 pr,r_ -;_ 'igure came from Arden bills. "This is a special <br />case where a distortion occurs. %id. "Arden Hills refune i bonds last <br />year. Our reperting system cam+. . payment of old bonds a. c• It service, <br />but it does not count the new " -s revenue. Th? truth is ..,at Arden Hills <br />.as had close to average d�i,t service costs in recent years, and will probably <br />cc 1t?nu,_ to •lo so." <br />Carlson said that cities which use sh o t-teem borrowing also r high rat: <br />of debt servic•_ `o current revenue. Other cities, he said, ha,(� ...- ge one-time <br />3ebt service costs berm a they defer princ ,)a: paym,_nts to the final year f a <br />tond iss-.e while paying only is:tereF durir, , the term of the .slue. <br />"We have placed special 4s on uniform ac,,,-unL ; so t`. we can me . <br />direct comb icons between cities,' Carlson pointed out. "� arisons become <br />tricky in the debt service category, hnwever, `.ecause of inir,u� :o..dl <br />circumstances." <br />Carlson said that Moody's bone' rating ,.igency encourages cities L(� keep e-ebt <br />ser,i, at less tha. !0 percent of current revenue. d the median Figure <br />amonk mccro cities ',. 198' was abort 2? h Yetcent. <br />- 2 - <br />