My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-13-1986 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1986
>
10-13-1986 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2026 1:35:30 PM
Creation date
1/16/2026 1:25:31 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
332
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES Uk' "E r1.AWNING CJMMISS UN 14L:E` .Li+% :;Ll P1iPrWER ii.), 1986 <br />#1079 MCDOWELL CONTINUED <br />Gary Peterson stated that he dia not feel this was <br />"spot" zoning because adjacent zoning districts are <br />zoned 2- acres. He stated that it would not be <br />beneficial to put in a road to serve one 5 acre lot. <br />Peg Swanson noted that there are some natural barriers <br />that separate this property from the other 5 acre zoning <br />district north by the Luce Line and on the west by <br />extensive wetlands. <br />McDonald stated that the area was originally zoned 5- <br />acres because Stubbs Bay is a critical area and to sewer <br />the area would be too costly. <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that it is <br />costly to sewer Stubbs Bay and secondly, there is no way <br />of knowing at this point whether this area would be <br />included in a sewer project. <br />Planning Commission's feelings regarding rezoning are: <br />Chairman Kelly, Taylor, Hanson, Goetten, and Bellows <br />feel this area could be rezoned 2-acre and <br />definitely not "spot" zoning. <br />McDonald opposed to rezoning for reasons previously <br />stated. <br />Chairman Kelley noted that if it is rezoned 2-acre, the <br />City will not grant variances to new developments. <br />McDonald noted the soils map which indicates a <br />substantial amount of area unable to sustain a septic <br />system. <br />Bellows reitterated that the soils maps can be grossly <br />inaccurate and applicant should have the opportunity to <br />do some testing. <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that the <br />septic systems for the newer houses in that area seem to <br />be functioning properly. <br />It was noted that lot configurations may or may not be <br />an issue and that septic test results may require <br />creation of irregular lots. <br />McDonald suggested that staff research the reasons why <br />that area was zoned 5-acre back in 1975. <br />Planning Commission recommended Council input and public <br />hearing on rezoning of this property. <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.