My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-13-1986 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1986
>
10-13-1986 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2026 1:35:30 PM
Creation date
1/16/2026 1:25:31 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
332
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
kA.WUTES OF TdH c'LMNING MELTING HLLD SEPTEMBER 15, t,86 <br />#1075 DURDA CONTINUED <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that <br />existing plastic under rock beds could be removed in the <br />0-75' zone resulting in no increase from the pre- <br />existing hardcover. <br />No one was present from the public regarding this matter <br />and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Chairman Kelley, soconded by Goetten, <br />to: <br />1) recommend approval of the c-ltwa 1 k between the <br />bedroom and upper porch as proposed. <br />2) recommend denial of a hardcover increase, but <br />approval of the after -the -fact deck subject to the <br />removal of at least 72 s.f. of plastic so that the <br />existing 11.27% hardcover is not exceeded and allow <br />the use of geotechnical fabric in place of removed <br />plastic. <br />Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />#1079 JOHN MCDOWELL <br />3820, 3830, 3860, 3750 BAYSIDE ROAD <br />S_r?rCH PLAN REVIEW FOR PROPOSED REZONING, <br />S,.-.-:.DIVISION, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />John McDowell, Gary Peterson, Peg Swanson, and Mr. & <br />Mrs. Andrew Miner were present for this matter. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained the purpose of <br />the sketch plan review is to provide the subdivider an <br />opportunity to present his conceptual plans for <br />development. The specific review process serves as a <br />basis for conceptual discussion between the City and <br />subdivider, hopefully, providing beneficial savings for <br />the subdivider. She noted that the property is <br />currently zoned RR-lA 5-acre Rural zone and Subdivider <br />proposes to rezone to RR-lB or LR-lA 2-acre zone. <br />Gary Peterson reviewed the area and pointed out which <br />lots currently sustain residences. He explained that <br />the area was approximately 42 acres consisting of <br />approximately 17 acres of wetland and 2.7 acres buildable <br />area. They propose 10 parcels of approximately 2.7 <br />acres buildable area each. <br />McDonald stated that the current standards comply with <br />the intent of tht• 5-acre zoning district and felt that <br />"spot" rezoning was only beneficial to the developer. <br />She noted that Issues such as sewer were taken into <br />consideration when this area was zoned 5-acre. <br />Bellows suggested thatthe wetland area be verified <br />because the maps have proven to be very unreliable. <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.