Laserfiche WebLink
The code also pro'4 • pies that the upper 24 inches ipon <br />which a mound is to be constructed have a percolet ion <br />rate no slower than 120 minutes per inch and 'he <br />maximum allowable slope is based on the percoiatio. <br />rate in that 24 inches. Tests 2 and 4 were taken to <br />check that this requirement was met and that maximum <br />slopes were not exceeded. The average of the 33 mpi <br />rate measured in Test 2 and the 11 mpi rate me-asured in <br />Test 4 is 22 mpi and where that average rate is faster <br />than 30 mpi the code provides that up tL- 12% slope is <br />allowable compared with the 11.5; that yo- measure from <br />our cor..ours. <br />We nol.- further that page E-8 of the On Site Sewage <br />Treatment Manual suggests that recent research and <br />analysis indicate that basal width and not slope: is the <br />importz consideration in such designs. <br />It would `eve been helpful to enumerate these tests and <br />show ci lation of the ave-age to avoid confusion. <br />.ur draftsman plotted the location of Perc. Test No. <br />)n the drawing and it is '�ndicated Ly a dark dot as are <br />.he other tests but he failed to copy the 1, from <br />t::e work drawing and we did not cater his omis:. u...c_.r <br />review of fle rather congested site plan. <br />We note that during an ini*ial site evaluation on a <br />difficult site with limited space, the ultimate <br />location of the treatment 1.rea ►nay not be readily <br />apparent. The evaluator may have tc use his best <br />estimate of where the treatment area may be located and <br />then sample in a way that gives him an overall feel for <br />the percoiz�! ion rotes on site so that he is n a <br />position to estimate the percolation rate no n.. er <br />where the--eatment area mar finally be placed. If <br />after a fi,,dl placement of the proposed mou; rea is <br />made, the location of the tests taken the <br />vEriability of the tests ai Such that test_ under <br />the actual mound site migt-,t produce rei.uitD so <br />different that they would materially affect the desi-n, <br />V there additional tests mould be taken. in this <br />ii .ance, to ten-tour basal area inadequate, we would <br />hav to find pv--lation rates Greater than 31 mpi <br />under the mound. We uidn't feel and continue to feel <br />that this is not at all likely in light of th- tests <br />3ken and thus did r-t test further. <br />