|
MINUTES OF THE
<br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
<br />Monday, March 17, 2014
<br />6:30 o'clock p.m.
<br />Johnson stated in the discussions he has had with the property owners, it appears the further back the
<br />house is located, the more impact the cabin would have on the view.
<br />Lemke stated the deck is six feet wide and would need to be mov~d five to six feet.
<br />Johnson stated they would not be blocking any views from the one direef · and that if the house on the
<br />neighboring property gets rebuilt, it would be oriented a dif(eren.t way; on stated it would not be a
<br />desirable line of sight if that house faces this property,J~$pecially give,11 tn¢tie~s,
<br />Landgraver stated the Planning Commission is struggligwi,th ~heth~;th:~trti~f~'.is~9uldbelocated
<br />behind the average setback line. · · · · .· · · ·
<br />Johnson stated it can be done but that it is a preference on.ih{t~~;eftyi()wners' pa~t:focate it there.
<br />,,, ,,., · <.,:;,;·,,,, •. ,·i::, I".:
<br />Landgraver asked if the practical difficulty is the vie";'. pf the old ~c1.~~~t1d t}ietopography of the land.
<br />', '/\?
<br />Johnson indicated it is and would result in onetit}f.n;;t·· t~:~f removed.ifthehouse is pushed further
<br />back. Johnson stated there is a small changedn. tlie•ele\i . ~j,tli~ fades, which would not be much of
<br />an issue if the structure is moved further ba9k, ijut that pru.t'cift}ie, ¢h~Hep~e is also providing access for
<br />equipment. · · · ·· · ··
<br />Leskinen asked if the Planning CoQ1I1:\ission is okaywitlj the cot}ditional use permit.
<br />•:i,< :'.> .\'.i' ;
<br />Gaffron noted the Big Island Code w,$,~dopted backm:1:9~39r'i984 and that this is the first time a
<br />question has come up regarding ph.mibing in a guest cabin on Big Island. The Code talks about guest
<br />cabins as a conditional use wherr:theyha:ve indoor toilet and/or kitchen facilities. The provision that
<br />would need to be II1etjs that it hast<> ~f£(}11ll,~cted. The other provision has to do with the size of the
<br />building. .9'':lfffotUn.djeat~ he would rafJJt,Hf:t\the City Attorney look at this prior to the plumbing being
<br />removedfrpi;t1 1the gu~stnQt1sesince it app~s the~qde may be in conflict with itself.
<br />::: .. ·.·,•;; y . ·< . . .•>.. ·:>;; :',;·.·J/:: . .,.·)
<br />Letllk~ a;'ed what options the Pl.g Com;f~sion has on this application.
<br />, , ,... ' .,._, .. ,,.,,
<br />,· ,,,:,q,v:,
<br />Leskiileilstated the Planning Coiptnission could approve the application, deny it, or ask if the applicants
<br />wotddli¥c,tr;:itable it to allow thetn:J<:>redesign/relocate the structure. Leskinen stated she does not see
<br />any strongr¢~9n to table it.
<br />Schoenzeit mo:ved,B~rg s~on~"d; to recommend approval of Application No. 14-3658, Suncrest
<br />Builders-WausauHomes on be.half of John and Alice Reimann, 440 Big Island, granting of a lot
<br />area variance and a ¢(j•~ino,al use permit for a guest cabin which exceeds 600 square feet, and to
<br />deny the request for anaverage lakeshore setback variance for a portion of the proposed seasonal
<br />cabin to extend into the average lakeshore setback, with the recommendation that the subject
<br />building be located behind the average lakeshore setback, subject to a review by the City Attorney
<br />on the plumbing requirements for the guest cabin, and subject to Staff's recommendations.
<br />VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays O.
<br />Page 19 of 26
|