|
MINUTES OF THE
<br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
<br />Monday, March 17, 2014
<br />6:30 o'clock p.m.
<br />Schoenzeit stated in his view less disruption would be better and that the variance would be unique to this
<br />property.
<br />Landgraver asked if the house to the south is in a different orientation.
<br />Curtis indicated it is.
<br />Landgraver asked if the house to the north is almost par~lekwith
<br />Curtis indicated it is.
<br />Leskinen commented the average lakeshore setback line>is ..,µcµ;1-.,µc1 5,·µ,,g on an islandwjth aJakeshore that
<br />curves.
<br />'.:',,· '<·<-;\;.
<br />Landgraver noted this is new development, and ifther~ is an opportutiitytt{dojt correctly, the Planning
<br />Commission should not dismiss it that quickly. ···· · · · · ·
<br />, .. ·.··'·." ", ;'.
<br />Schwingler stated not having the variance wq;ul.p Be prefe4f{611tthat he understands the desire to retain
<br />the trees. ·. · · · ·
<br />::/_,'\'·.:: '::·::,;,,,·;·::: ""· :--?.//· :..:.ii",";'i.'.·\ :,,,:
<br />Lemke stated it appears from the tree ~urveythatthey~~uld o:i{t.t~i,rupting one 8-inch tree to move
<br />the house further back. ·· · ·· · · ·
<br />, ; '';•,• ;,'-, ,m,•,
<br />Schwingler stated given that, hewotildlean more toward4en.ialofthe average lakeshore setback variance
<br />provided the tree survey is con;~ct.
<br />Curtis stated the .. SllfVyy does depictthetrees,
<br />Schoenzeifas~edif th,~J~tu4~yi;;. esseniially ~tr~t.
<br />',·· .. ,;,;,;·,<<;;; .. ·;,",'' .,· •.;
<br />Johnson&uit~d there are
<br />0i rii1111Biriof trees that ~rl;maller than what is required to be placed on a survey
<br />but:that ifis essentially correct. ·• ·
<br />',',' ·,", .·' '•,'",,
<br />Ber~a*e?i!f,the deck would be located within the 0-75 foot zone.
<br />Curtis statiathe;ntii:e back part;of:the deck would be within the 0-75-foot zone as well as a portion of
<br />the screen porch. ... •.. . . . ..
<br />~ ·,·.--·:·, "'' _;;·.;,;,,/:,,·;.;
<br />Berg stated if it is m~ita tii.;lfthree to five feet, it would not be in the average lakeshore setback. Berg
<br />asked if the applicant wou.ld be impacted by moving the structure back three to five feet to eliminate the
<br />need for the average lakeshore setback variance.
<br />Johnson stated he is not sure whether that would impact them and noted the majority of the screen porch
<br />is outside the average lakeshore setback but the deck is not. Johnson pointed out the location of the
<br />screen porch and that a little corner of it would fall into that setback.
<br />Lemke noted the deck encroaches into the setback.
<br />Page 18 of 26
|