Laserfiche WebLink
~ DR <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, November 16, 2009 ~ DR! <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />Rahn stated it would be a different situation if the road did go down to the lake but the fact that it is <br />private property makes the request by the applicant a legitimate one. <br />Eiden stated there is a 1944 court decision regarding a vacation on St. Oliver's Bay where a homeowner <br />attempted to close off an access , but that he does not have the money to pursue this matter in court. Eiden <br />indicated he probably will continue to use that area for access even if the road is vacated. <br />Rice stated in her view it is private property and that the road leads no where except to Mr. Hanson's <br />property. <br />Kang indicated in her view the deciding factor is the fact that it is private property. <br />Kang moved, Rice seconded, to recommend approval of Application #09-3433, Richard Hanson, <br />340 Big Island, granting of a lot area variance and vacation of unimproved Meta Comet Avenue <br />subject to the recommendations of Staff. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />(Loren Schoenzeit recuzed himself from the following application) <br />5. #09-3435 LOREN AND STACEY SCHOENZEIT, 4480 FOREST LAKE ING, <br />V,.,.__._,...,---. CE, 8:02 P.M. -8:35 P.M. <br />Schoenzeit, Applicants, were present. <br />Curtis stated the app nt is requesting the following variances in orde o construct a new residence on <br />the property: <br />2. <br />3. <br />A lot area variance to allow redevelo <br />A side yard setback variance to allow a <br />setback is normally required; <br />a lot 0.34 acre in area where 1.0 acre is required; <br />t side setback on the south side where a 10-foot <br />4. A rear yard setback variance t llow an 8-foot rear set ck where a 30-foot setback is normally <br />required; <br />5. Hardcover variances allow 66.1 percent hardcover within the 2 <br />percent is normal allowed and 62.8 percent currently exists. <br />The applicants' pro rty has a very challenging building envelope. The city sewer Ii crosses through <br />the property and e slope of the property offer very little flexibility. The applicants hav <br />subject prope for nearly 19 years. For the past 10 years , they have been researching and <br />new home o build on the property. <br />5, the applicants received approval for a lot line rearrangement in order to allow for a more <br />re sonable building envelope. That lot line rearrangement was not finalized. The applicants are now <br />------------------Page <br />11