My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Big Island
>
340 Big Island - 23-117-23-32-0076
>
Land Use
>
09-3433, VAC
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2026 12:25:26 PM
Creation date
1/15/2026 12:23:13 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~ DR <br />Turner indicated it is. <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, November 16, 2009 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. ~D <br />Jeff Lambert, Attorney -at-Law, noted that Mr . Hanson is presently recuperating from surgery and is <br />unable to attend tonight 's meeting. The reason for the vacation is for the same reason as was approved in <br />2002 . Mr. Hanson 's property totally surrounds the vacated portion of Meta Comet and ends <br />approximately 40 feet from the lake . Meta Comet does not lead to an y other property except Mr. <br />Hanson 's. Lambert noted that in 1986 , the applicant was George Hanson , who is the father of Richard <br />Hanson , and that they have always treated the parcels as one lot. <br />Kang noted one of the reasons for requesting the vacation is that Mr. Hanson is experiencing some people <br />parking on his property . <br />Lambert stated they do experience boaters coming to the island and partying on his property. One of the <br />concerns that Mr. Hanson has is the lack of enforcement at night. <br />Schoenzeit asked if the easement is unimproved. <br />Lambert stated it is unimpro ved except for the electrical line. <br />Chair Kang opened the public hearing at 7:45 p.m. <br />John Eiden, 330 Big Island , stated if Meta Comet is vacated , he would like to have his street vacated as <br />well since there is a historic building on the lot. Eiden indicated he is opposed to closing the street since <br />it is used by a number of the residents in order to access the lake . There are a number of people who do <br />party in this area and that it has been part of the culture of the neighborhood to go down to the beach. It is <br />currently not differentiated between what is public property and what is private property, which could <br />lead to liability issues for Mr. Hanson. Eiden stated even if the street is vacated , people wi ll still utilize <br />the road to access the beach. <br />Eiden pointed out on the overhead how the 36 feet could be flip-flopped , which would take it away from <br />Mr. Hanson's property, and that there are other options that could be pursued rather than vacating the <br />street. <br />Rahn asked where the beach is located. <br />Eiden pointed out the location of the beach on the overhead . <br />Rahn asked if that is private property since the road stops short of the lakeshore. <br />Curtis indicated the road does stop short of the lakeshore. <br />Chair Kang closed the public hearing at 7:48 p.m . <br />Kang stated she understands the concerns of Mr. Eiden but that the piece of property located beyond the <br />road is private property. <br />Eiden stated he would like to see the vacated road flip -flopped and commented that everybody believes it <br />is public land and will probably continue to use it for access to the lake . <br />_________________ Page <br />10 <br />t <br />f
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.