My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-11-1986 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1986
>
08-11-1986 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2026 12:40:23 PM
Creation date
1/9/2026 12:37:59 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
257
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR OROMO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 28, 1986 <br />#1050 THOMAS R. BROWNS <br />760 BROWN ROAD SOUTH <br />VARIANCE <br />RESOLUTION i2027 <br />Thomas R. Browne was present for this matter. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for <br />a front yard setback variance to construct an addition <br />to replace an existing porch and construct an attached <br />garage. He noted that applicant is changing the <br />driveway access layout which staff finds acceptable. <br />Planning Commission recommended approval. <br />It was moved by Councilmember Grabek, seconded by <br />Councilmember Adams, to adopt Resolution i2027 approving <br />the variance as presented. Motion, Ayes 3, Mays 0. <br />11054 STEVEN SCHNEBLY <br />2555 COUNTRYSIDE DRIVE <br />VARIANCE <br />RESOLUTION #2O28 <br />Steven Schnebly was present for this matter. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request <br />for after -the -fact variances to permit the construction <br />of masonry walls flanking his driveway entrance which <br />exceed the 42" maximum height allowance and require a <br />variance because they are structure within a front yard <br />area. <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaff -on stated that the <br />Planning Commission voted 3-2 to approve the request, <br />with the minority opinion being that a similar type of <br />structure was recently disapproved on Brackett's Point <br />(Pillsbury serpentine wall) and approval of the <br />Countryside Drive application would be inconsistent. <br />Staff differentiates this application from the Pillsbury <br />application in that it is essentially two pillars rather <br />than a continuous wall. <br />In response to the question by Mayor Butler, Mr. <br />Schnebly stated that he did not plan to put anything on <br />top of the entrance pillars. <br />It was moved by Councilmember Grabek, seconded by <br />Councilmember Adams, to adopt Resolution 12028 granting <br />the after -the -fact variances as presented. Motion, Ayes <br />3, Rays 0. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.