08-11-1986 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

3. The Orono Planning-�mmission reviewed this application on July 21, 1986, and recc: ended approval of the proposed variances based upon the -^llowiny findings: A) An . ccident on County Road 15 created _d t� make major st •tral repairs to nor. -conforming structures. B) Applicant reports that this is the third incident it property damage sustained by th• applicant from traffic accidents since 1968. C) The fencing and accessory shed have existed on t.e property for several years. D) The structures t.�ate no visual impact from lakeside nor the adjacent roadway. E) The proposed ;se of the structures ara recognized as conforming res '-nt.ial uses. F) The higher elevations of the adjacent roadbed provide a vision barrier for structures on applicant's lakeehore. G) The fenc and shed create re hazards for t,.a pedestrian or vehicle u rs of the roadway. R) The fence . sr.ed will not block lake vtew^ of or rounding lekeshore lot owners. I) Applicant's r•-idence ie located to the immediate we on the opposito of County Road 15 • gym the lakeshoi,e property. 4. The City C •:ncil has -,,aside •ed this application including the findings and recomm, tio..0 of the Planning Commi-sion, reports by City staff, comments uy the applic and the :feet of the proposed vari-nce on the health, safety t welfare if the community. 5. The City r- noil fit. a th..t the conditions exist'ng or: this property are 'nr to it and :o ne' apply genera'. to r+ Oro, irty in t1, . -on!ng distri•-t; that gr--t.ing the var! wou .i not adveree�iy affect trAfiiC co;.diti. s, light, ai. pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighbor: g property; would not merely serve as a cor••enienc, t, he applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantiz' • onerty right of the pplicant; and would be it: keeping wi ' spirit ai intent of •Ne Zoning tode and Compre =naive P1: u. ..nc City. Page 2 of t