07-14-1986 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #1040 June 12, 1986 Page 2 of 2 The applicant has claimed that the wall will be constructed in the same manner as the first installation. Plans have not been submitted to confirm this nor, as the City Enginner's report confirms, has the plan submitted with application been certified correctly by the licensed engineer. This must be corrected before the City can is-ue a building permit for construction of sea wall. The initial installation provided for earthern tone aluminum wall sections (each section 9" wide). The wall extends approximately 20" above the ordinary high water mark and would stand 8' high (6 1J3 feet of the wall would be under water and lake bed). As in the first review, the City will n(-`. approve any walkway along the edge of the sea wall that would involve hard- cover within the 0-75' setback area. Staff recommends approval of the extension of the sea wall but will not sched le the application for final pproval by Council until the applicant's engineer certifies in writing that specifications for wall are the same as approved with initial installation and that the plan meets standard design criteria and not that "it appears to do so". Resolution 1522 has been enclosed for your consideration and may be used in drafting the necessary findings for granting approval of current application. Staff would suggest that thi, Duld be an appropriate time to remind applicant that he is limited to mooring 4 boats (boats in excess of 16 feet) at his residential dock(s). Additional Commentb and Planning Commission Recommendation: The applicant's engineer has recertified the plans for the sea wall as required by our City Engineer. Planning Commission recommended approval of the extension of the sea wall along the lago-n shoreline based on the findings and conditions set forth in `.he enclosed resolution.