07-14-1986 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #1038 June 12, 1986 Page 2 of 2 Applicant also wishes to lower the hill between house and garage to create a usable, flat lawn area, which the property really does not have currently. This potentially will increase the absorption capability of this area, hence, some benefit to run-off quality may be provide'. The additional hillside to be graded, beyond the grading needed for the garage, amounts to about 80-90 cubic yards; this amount will not require a cc:iditional use permit but can be handled on a staff basis. A $50 grading permit will be required. No setback variances are required for the garage. Note that the setback from the centerline of vacated Oak Place would only have to be 10' by code. Note that there is a City sewer line in the vacated roadway. The 9.2'xl2.2' shed is less than 120 s.f., hence a building permit is not required to move it, but it does have to meet the 10' side setback and be 10' from the garage, or be attached to the garage while maintai+ 'ng less than 1,000 s.f. in total garage area. Applicant shoulc" •,,efine where shed will be located if it stays on the property. To recommend approval of the hardcover variance, Planning Commission should find adequate hardjhips to justify granting of the hardcover variances. These might include: 1. No existing garage with this year-round residence. 2. Regrading of yard area may have some beneficial effect on run -of f . 3. Garage proposed will allow removal of nuous small sheds on property. /WD ��CvhCi `;Lu,?CS c?�rJ�/n�G Ar-F �`. F-V'✓'��Nl' conditions should include: 1. Adequate erosion protection during grading and construction. 2. Specify which (and where) existing sheds shall be removed or relocated. 3. Require staff -level grading permit for excess excavation work. C�)- P. C ,�P, �J—Ca 1�ECo�rtr�t TtK-' "rr' VA�c#APCC PCi