My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-09-1986 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1986
>
06-09-1986 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2026 2:33:33 PM
Creation date
1/5/2026 2:16:57 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
505
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6586.1 <br />a -7 <br />TO: Mayor and City Council COUNCIL MEETING <br />FROM: mark Bernharason, City Administrato� <br />JUiJ <br />DATE: June 5, 1936 <br />SUBJECT: 1985 Police Operations <br />Attached is a summary of both the statistics from the Criminal <br />Justice Information System for the City of Orono and also for the <br />entire Orono Police operation including Long Lake, Spring Park <br />and Minnetonka Beach together with the computer printout and <br />Summary of Operations for the entire Police Department for '85. <br />As you will note over the years the number of actual offences has <br />gone from a total of a little over a 1,000 in 1980 up to as high <br />as 1,600 in 1981 and then dropping back into the 1,100 or 1,290 <br />range during the last three years. For the most part clearance <br />rates by arrests have remained relatively constant in a range for <br />Part 1 of`enses of 14% to 23% for Orono and 17 to 25% for the <br />operation in total. For Part 2 offense clearance by arrest for <br />Orono range has been from 39 to 52s in the overal.i police <br />operation range has been from 33 to almost 60%. The reason for <br />the clearance rates difference between Part 1 and Part 2 is that <br />among other things DWI falls in the Part 2 range and the vast <br />majority of those are arrests. <br />It maybe of additional interest that since Spring Park has joined <br />the contLact in 1981 Orono generally makes up about 50 to 55% of <br />the total. Part 1 and Part 2 crimes with Long Lake between 17 and <br />20%; Minnetonka Beach ranging between 3 1/2 to 6% and Spring Park <br />hetween 14 and 23%. For 1985 the budgeted share versus offense <br />report (which do not ^,)nstitute total p ,ce service activities) <br />are as follows: <br />City Percent of Percent of Total <br />'85 Budget Part 1 and 2 offenses <br />Orono 50. 1% i 3 . 5+% <br />Tong Lake 21.2% 19.''k <br />Minnetonka BF,ach 5.2% 3.8% <br />Spring Park 23.4% 22.8i <br />As noted in the 185 figurt�s the f,)rmula which bases the <br />(iistrihution on population and valuation; does not produce results <br />significantly different from what the totals of the offences <br />reported. <br />Should you hive any further qur,tion:; or comments please feel <br />free to Aisc-uss them with mr_. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.