Laserfiche WebLink
1) it is at least one acre in size, and the average <br />width of the lot is at '_east 100 feet; and <br />2) it is either served by public sanitary sewer or <br />meets all the septic system requirements of the City or <br />other governmental body; and <br />3) it otherwise meets the requirements of this or <br />other applicable ordinances. <br />Under this Code, the Council, at their option, could have granted a <br />lot area variance for a tot of single separate ownership, but the Code <br />again did not specifically discuss an, standards for the separation of <br />con,_ _)nly owned lots. <br />22. City policy regarding the separation of unsewered, undeveloped <br />substandard, contiguous lots in common ownership was clearly defined <br />by an action of the City Council in 1981, in which the separation of a <br />developed 1.4 acre lot fr--,t:i the adjacent vacant 1.7 acre, 120.3 foot <br />wide vacant lot in the LP -IA 2-acre, 200 foot width, unsewered zone <br />was denied. (Application Nc,. 635, Council action to deny on October <br />26, 1981, based on: a) lack of demonstrated hardship; b) no <br />as-'tary sewer available; c) insufficient area; d) insufficient <br />wi <br />23. the 1984 Zoning Code amendments included the addition of Section <br />1.0.03, Subdivision 6 (C), which prohibited the "transfer or sale of <br />non -conforming, undeveloped lots not served by public sanitary sewer, <br />aligned in a contiguous arrangement, undivided by a public or private <br />road or road easer- rt and under same or common ownership" unless <br />specifically approved by the City Council , or un le , - the resulting <br />lots satisfy the area and width requirements of th .oniaa C__ ie. No <br />performance standards for approval of such transfers )car in the <br />code. <br />At least 13 properties or groups of properties in a situation <br />lar to Ferrells with a high potential for request of similar <br />ances h;-ve been identified within the City of Orono. <br />25. Since ,anuary 1, 1.975, when the 2 acre RR-lB zoning district <br />became effective, no permits have been issued for new residences on <br />commonly owned substandard lots in the RR-lB district. Of 153 new <br />resid,•nvr� permits issued in the RR-lB district from 1/1/75 to 5/l/86, <br />145 permits have been issued for conformi.na lots, 7 permits have been <br />issued for substandard lots of record in single separate ownership due <br />to the inability of applicants to combine or acquire additional land <br />to create conforming lots, and 1 permit was issued to demolish and <br />rebuild on a substandard single separate ownership lot where a house <br />was already existing. The City of Orono has consistently denied <br />pe-mi.ts for substandard lots owned in common with adjacent developed <br />in the RR-lB district. <br />Page 7 of 9 <br />