My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-09-1986 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1986
>
06-09-1986 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2026 2:33:33 PM
Creation date
1/5/2026 2:16:57 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
505
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
19. The applicant maintains that when th-- zoning was proposed to b- <br />changed from R-1C (1 acre) to RR-lB ( 2 acre) in L974, he attended the <br />public hearings and was told that his lots would still be buildable <br />under the new zoning. This occurrence has not been documented by the <br />,., dlic"nt nor c in it be verified by the City. Whether or not it <br />occurred, the Zoning Code adopted by the City Council would be <br />binding. Mr. Ferrell was notified in writing by the City in 1981, <br />upon inquiry, that under the current code, no building permits for a <br />new house would be issued, and that no basis existed for the granting <br />of variances. <br />20. The 1967 Zoning Code,which designated the property as R-lC, 1 <br />acre, 140 foot w:.dth, stated as follows regarding existing lots of <br />record: <br />31.200. Existing Lots. A lot of record existing upon September <br />14, 1967 Wne effective date of tLe Zoning Code) under single <br />separate ownership in a "R" Residential District, which does not <br />meet the requirements of the Zoning Code as to area or width may <br />be uti;izei:: for a single family detached dwelling purpose <br />provided th �_t in the judgment of the Council such use does not <br />adversely affect public health or safety. Single separate owner- <br />ship includes joint ownership by not more than two persons. <br />The 1967 Code dial not discuss common ownership properties nor did it <br />differentiate between sewered and unsewered lots of record. However, <br />by using the term "Single Separate ownership", it implied that other <br />types of ownership would be treated differently but did not define in <br />what way. Under this code, the applicant would have been allowed to <br />build on Parcel 3. without a variance because the lot met the standards <br />of the R-lC zoning district. Parcel 2 would have required a lot area <br />variance in order to be legally buildable. <br />21. The Zoning Code adopted January 1, 3.975, which declared the <br />property to be ztone3 RR-lB, 2 Acre Single Family Residential, stated <br />as follows regarding existing lots of record: <br />31.201. Ex..sting Lots. A lot of record existing upon January 1, <br />1975 (the effective date of the Zoning Code) under single <br />separate ownership in an "R" District, which does not meet the <br />requirements of the Zoning Code as to area or width may be <br />utilized fo:- a single family detached dwelling purpose provided <br />that in the judg,!. nt of the Council such use does not adversely <br />affect public health or safety and the following requirements are <br />met: <br />31.203. In "R" districts of Greater Than One Acre. A tot <br />of record in any "R" District in the City in excess of one <br />acre, which does not meet the requirements of this Zonirg <br />Code a:.; to area or width only, may be utilized for single <br />family letached dwelling purposes if the Council finds: <br />Page 6 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.