My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-09-1986 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1986
>
06-09-1986 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2026 2:33:33 PM
Creation date
1/5/2026 2:16:57 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
505
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
JAMES A. MITCHELL <br />2685 North Shore Drive <br />Orono, Minnesota 55391 <br />April. 17, 1986 <br />Planning ComRiission <br />City of Orono <br />1275 South Brova Road <br />Orono, NN 55391 <br />Dear Commissioners: <br />Subject: 11020 Noerenberg Memorial County Park. <br />We will be c of town on Monday, April 21, and therefore <br />are unable to attend the public hearing on Noerenberg Park. <br />We do however want to comment on this application. <br />We live at 2685 North Shore Drive, on the lot immediately <br />adjacent to the east side of the park. Thus we are very <br />personally concerned with the developme-it which is being <br />proposed. <br />We believe that Mrs. Noerenberg's intent in donating this <br />park to the county is clear. She wished to make a space <br />available where residents oi- the county could go to enjoy <br />nature. This might take the form of looking at beautiful <br />flowers or pastoral woodlands. <br />We have serious questions about whether the lurQe facilities <br />which are being proposed are appropriate in a rural residen- <br />tial area. If these buildings are constructed, we believe it <br />essent4.1 that their exterior be consistent with the pastoral <br />setting in which they are located. <br />Of even greater si.gnifican-.- to us is the proposed parking <br />lot. We believe that it is appropriate fo:. the park to <br />include a facility for parking, anti think h: r 50 spaces is <br />not excessive. However, we feel very si '..�ly that this <br />parking lot should not impair our enjoytier c our property <br />nor impose on the rural character of our neighborhood. We <br />strongly urge you to require a berm whit-h would screen the <br />parking lot from our view, andia series of lantiIl s to <br />further enhance the rural nature of the park and screen the <br />devel9pment from us (;nd us from the users of the park). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.