My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-09-1986 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1986
>
06-09-1986 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2026 2:33:33 PM
Creation date
1/5/2026 2:16:57 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
505
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
j h. .::S OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 21, L986 <br />#1020 SUB. HENN. REG. PARK DIST. continued <br />r.Iarilyn Schal 1, 605 Park Lane, stated her concern was <br />that the proposal seemed to be a complete overhaul of <br />the park. <br />Kathy Swenson, 3020 North Shore Drive, stated that she <br />felt the plan did not maintain the intent of Orono's <br />natural setting by commercializing the rural area. <br />Stan Rudd, 601 Park Lane, noted an interest in the park <br />by Ray Forde. <br />Mr. Jessen stated they are aware of Mr. Forde's life <br />estate or: two acres within the northern ar?a and intend <br />to honor as such. <br />There were no more comments from the public and the <br />public hearing was closed. <br />Bellows stated she felt it was a very ambitious <br />landscape plan and finds little support in favor. 5Iie <br />suggested a greenhouse type of plan and that the <br />structure should be more of an open pavillion. <br />McDonald stated she was against having a "brick" <br />building in a rural park. <br />Rovegno stated that the lard use issue should be <br />addressed ^nd suggested the entire plan be sent to the <br />Park Commission and Poloce Dept. for review. He also <br />stated that he felt the wedding aspect created the need <br />for the hardcover parking lot. <br />Chairman Kelley stated that he fe the plans were <br />ambitious concerning the hardcover 1, o the south and <br />felt that it should be limited to 25 p, -,ing spots. He <br />does not feel a building should be ac'- -sseC 'or <br />classroom needs or sales and should be an _ n she.'. 9r. <br />Ile also stated he was not disagreeable to the gene. 1 <br />upgrading but had concerns about the increased use. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth suggested tabling nis <br />matter in order to provide the Planning Commissioni ith <br />more background (i.e. comments from the Park Comm, ion <br />and Planning _ommission member Goetten who servts on <br />this specific park committee) and cle-ificati.on c the <br />will. <br />.+as it-,11yed ny Chairman Kelley, secorded by McDonald, <br />cable this matter pending clarification of the will <br />and the district court interpretation of the will, chief <br />Ki lbo to review, and notification of this proposal to <br />Commissioner Robb, and staff to rev-1 ew the matter with <br />the Orono Park Commission. Iā¢lotion, ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.