Laserfiche WebLink
)ning File #1004 <br />February 14, 1986 <br />Page 3 <br />The C:_ty has not always followed these directives giving <br />subdivision approval without appropriate variar therefore, tending <br />to favor more practical and workable patterns i,. _he design of lots. <br />If you doubt this, cor ider all the lots approved that are served by <br />private access easerr -s, extended platted corridors and cul-de-s4rs <br />approved without ac' -o sing the need for a variance because lot did <br />not abut a public .-•,:d for the required width. Staff recalls the <br />subdivisions approved right after the common ownership issue was <br />resolved (review the enclosed plat). The Smiley application is a <br />prime example for comparison. <br />Consider the specific structure; staff would classify '-he garage <br />use as the primary use authorized for guest house use with a <br />conditional use permit in 1981. The second floor pool house/changing <br />rooms use is secondary and required a guest house/conditional use <br />permit when a kitchen was to be installed. The-itchen has no* een <br />installed. The second floor now 2rves as addi--, )nal storage area. A <br />future owner may never divide the property and designate the accessory <br />garage/apartment structure as a principal structure - not on Bohns Pt <br />real estate. <br />As for comments on this specific sketch plan, staff would argue <br />that with minor rearrangements of the lot lire providing expanded yard <br />areas around the two structures, this subdivision could be as <br />acceptable as others -approved by the City without noting the need for <br />variances. <br />The City is being asked to approve the lot line rearrangement of <br />Lots 1 and 2, Lyd'_ard Park. Parcel B's excess of hardcover within the <br />75-250' setback area can be resolved by either the removal of the 1.7% <br />of hardcover or adjusting the lot line to provide additional area to <br />offset the excess. The applicant must decide. <br />Per Section 10.09, Subdivision 8, it would appear that the 1981 <br />conditional use permit has expired because the original applicant had <br />failed to install the kitchen within a year - f the date of Ccunci 1 <br />approval. 7_.e original conditional use permit id not address the use <br />of the structure as an additional bedroom or guest room use. A pool <br />side changing house would not require a conditional use permit. <br />Subdivision 9 of that same section also notes that a conditional use <br />permit wi " expire if that use has ceased for a six month period. <br />Applicant snould confirm if he wishes to apply for a conditional use <br />permit for guest house use. <br />Staff reco needs approval of the lot line rearrangement di-ision <br />application of William Ulrich and that the proposed subdiv n is <br />subject to the subdivison regulations of the City because of t,,e need <br />'o resolve the hardcover excess. Approval is subject to the following <br />_�ondi.tions: <br />