04-14-1986 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

File #990 Page 2 of 2 I) 300 Sixth Ave. N.- 2-plus parcels: w/house-100 ac.+; vacant- 3.5 acre. J) 879 North Brown Road - 2 parcels: w/house-1.0 acre; vacant- 2.6 acres. K ) 960 N. Willow Drive - 2 parcels: w/house-1.0 acre; vacant- 1.0 acre. L) 320 Turnham Read - 2 parcels: w/house-1.7 acres; vacant-1.1 acres. M) 200 Bederwood Road - 4 parcels: w/house-0.9 acre; vacant - 0.6 acre; vacant - 1.1 acre; vacant - 1.0 acre. These 13 cases can be broken down into a number of categories: 1. Tota. acreage of commonly -owned parcels is great. enough to yie13 conforming lots if lot lines are re -arranged: A,E,F,I. 2. Total acreage of commonly -owned parcels yields only enough area for a single substandard lot with existing house: C,D,L. 3. Total acreage of commonly -owned parcels yields enough area for a single conforming lot with house, but not enough additional area for a second conforming lot: B,G,H,J,K,M (these are very similar to Ferrell situation). III. To help Council assess the impact of granting or denying the Ferrell variances, consider the following figures: - Number of existing developed lots in the unsewered residential zones: 1,050 approximately - Numbei of undeveloped, substandard sized lots, in single separate ownership in unsewered zones: 15 identified - Number of unsewered common ownership sii.uationa with a realistic potential for requestinq variances to lot area in order to gain an additional building site: 22 identified (13 of these shown as A-M attacted) - Within a 1/2 mile radius of the Ferrell properties (excluding the 3 Stubbs Bay Study Area streets Tonka Avenue, Crestview Avenue, Eastlake Street where SeWe.- '.s contemplated) the existing developed lot sizes are: 2.0 acre or larger - 39 1.25 acre to 1.99 acre - 13 .75 acre to 1.24 acre - 23 i,ess than .7j- acre - 11