My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-14-1986 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1986
>
04-14-1986 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/29/2025 11:42:36 AM
Creation date
12/29/2025 11:29:53 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
383
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r r� � �'� r. •fin <br />TO: Orono City Council. <br />r'ROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator <br />DATE: April 11, 1986 <br />SOBJ: Request by VanEeckhout Building Corporation for Sewer Connection - <br />Property north of Long Lake Bank, east of North Brown Road <br />NOTE: This letter of request arrived while Mark Bernhardson was on vacation <br />and he has not had a chance to review it, hence I am including it as an <br />information item only. <br />The property in question is a parcel of about 140' x 1150' or 3.9 acres, of <br />which approximately 2.8 acres is dry buildable. The property is adjacent <br />to the City of Long Lake, and is adjacent to the VanEeckhout townhouses, <br />with a sewer manhole available about 25' from the south property line (see <br />topographical survey). Based on the location of the sewer so close to the <br />property, and based on the potential problems with slow -perking clay soils <br />and some steep slopes, VanEeckhout felt there would be a good case for <br />connecting this property to the sewer. In my meeting with VanEeckhout and <br />his site evaluator on the site on March 21., I concurred that indeed there <br />appeared to be potential problems in locating a primary and alternate <br />septic system on the property, and if they could document the infeasibility <br />of using an on -site system, the sewer connection might be looked upon more <br />favorably by the Council. <br />Documentation submitted to date includes: <br />A. Letter of request dated 4/7/E;6 - VanEeckhout makes 5 points: <br />1) Septic systems are more prone to failure than sanitary sewers <br />(this is a "given"). <br />2) Impermeable soils on the site (alluded to by site evaluator, <br />but sites have not been perc-tasted). <br />3) Steep slopes (perhaps the best argument for allowing sewer <br />connection to this property). <br />4) Practicality (due to existing old foundation locations, the <br />second or alternate site for a system would be 650' from the <br />proposed home site). <br />5) Potential for a future subdivision (this seems remote with <br />only 2.8 dry acres in a 2 acre zone). <br />B. Letter from Steve Shirmers, MPCA Certified Site Evaluator. This <br />letter documents the shallow depth to zones _)f seasonal saturation <br />inferred by soil mottling, which would require use of a mound system. <br />Mound systems cannot in any event be used where slopes exceed 12%, and <br />only can be used on slopes of 6-12% when the perc rates are 1/2 - 30 <br />minutes per inch, according to Orono's existing codes. Although perc <br />testing has not been done, the soils found by Shirmers would likely <br />have slower perc rates than are desirable for a mound on steeper <br />slopes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.