Laserfiche WebLink
b. Provide expanded funding for the new activit, levels prescribed in the <br />sections on Intergovernmental Coordination and Non -Local Funding, <br />elsewhere in this report (see pages 8, 10 and 12). <br />ISSUE 2: KING'S POINT BOAT LAUNCI; SITE Note: issue posit on subject to change <br />to accord with results of negotiatirn.) <br />Introduction <br />At the Feb. 12 meeting, the MCTFLM approved a motion which directed staf. to <br />draft a position paper on the issue of DNR's plan to develop a boat launch on <br />the King's Point site on Halsted's Bay which was consistent with the position <br />taken c he issue '-)y the city of Minnetrista. <br />Discussion <br />flee MCTFt.M has heard detailed presentations he issue from both DNR and <br />hinnetrista, has reviewer: the report of the 83TF and has card extensive com- <br />ment on Vi ;ssue frc!m Luther sources including persons ledgeabre about the <br />lake. <br />Li -,dings (Sub j ec: c to Chant <br />In their consideration of testimony on tree issue, the MCT- •'. f.,und that th• <br />weight of evidence was against DNR's development -if a boas launch site at <br />ting's Point at this time, for the fol lov,•ing rea..c .s among others: <br />- There are ether existing or alternate n cess points on Halsted's Bay <br />which appear to offer :'-quate access or. -_.t body of water, especially if <br />developed as proposed in toe work plan by 11inretrista. <br />fhe King's P->int site is inconsistent -gith local land use plans and should <br />not overriev zac h plans unless its nece,sity and ability to achieve a major <br />,,ublic bt +fit can be demonstrated. Discussions -about `ra proposal have <br />not demonst.'ated thvt benefit. <br />- The 83TF and Other input on the need fc new boat launch site - <br />Minnetonka do .,.,t indicate that Halsted's Bay is dasi able 1.':jce to pro- <br />vi + all the incraated access needed 'r' zone 5 or zn i upper lake. The <br />-;^eci•rc recommendation nor Smithtown Bay adjacent waters seems <br />to be a mort logical choice for a new access s`tr n zone 5, both f <br />reason of lake areas made accessitilt and for rood PCLebs. <br />Reco"sndation (Subj-,ct Vi Change) <br />That t .;r Aetropo 1 i tan Council i nfo; .__ ..;w Governor and the S Late Excrut i ve <br />Council that Minnesota L'AR development of the boat launch site or King's Poirt, <br />Halsted's Say of Lake Minnetonka, 0ould not proceed until it can be shown that <br />no better alternate can prov'de ad-quats Public small boat access on th ke. <br />7 <br />