04-14-1986 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #1010 April 10, 1986 Page 2 of 3 Site Plan Review - a) Setbacks Required Proposed Front 35' 35' Side 15' 15' Rear, 35' 80' The paved area setback from the newly defined retention area (932 elevation) is approximately 22 Note this is not a designated wetland and the 26 feet setback stan-lard does not apply. Silt fencing and hay bales will be placed ;.long the edge of the retention area/ drainageway prior to construction or gradincj. b) Parking (Section 10.61 Subdivis:)n 10(Q)) Sales area 80' x 63' r 5040 s.t. 1 space per 5040 - 500 = 4540 -- 500 = 9 spaces 9 spaces provided c) Henrepin County Highway D._.pt. Access has been approved - County has asked that access location be lined up with Dunwoody access at Shoreline Dr. In addition, the County asked that Katainen provide a turnaround for trucks on site - this has also been provided. d) Drainage The irai.nage plans have been approved by Glern Cook and the M.C.W.D.. In the conservation district letter ((_xhibit D) thev direct the applicant to seek written permission to construct a baffle weir on the County property. I have b?en advised by applicant's engir►eer that the County has refuf.ed try request finding similarly constructed weirs to freeze creating more se- vere problems. Katainen's plans p,ovide for a retention area that will compensate for the additional runoff cleated by the proposed hardcover and any fill placed below the 934 elevation. *Total ponding area - 25,600 square feet Proposed ponding area on site = 5,700 square feet *Area includes portions of garage and County properties to west in Orono and small residential neighborhood in Spring Park. Spring Park has been advised of the project and their staff has reviewed the drainage plans. They have ne concern as long as additional surface runoff created by the improvement is provided for on site.