My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 4687
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Resolution 0001-7547
>
Reso 4600 - 4699 (January 22, 2001 - October 8, 2001)
>
Resolution 4687
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/18/2019 3:35:30 PM
Creation date
11/16/2015 2:28:20 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
10 <br /> O O <br /> CITY of ORONO <br /> A%f <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> ��9kE H0NO. 4687 <br /> required lot area. The property consists of approximately .62 acres or 26,860 s.f. <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on August 20,2001 and <br /> recommended approval by a vote of 7 to 0. <br /> 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: <br /> A. The hardcover in the 0-75' setback zone is remaining the same. <br /> B. The hardcover in the 75-250' setback zone is decreasing from 6,084 s.f. <br /> (34.49%)to 6,060 s.f. (34.35%). <br /> C. The walkways and decks, except for the expansion on the north side, have <br /> existed for many years in the same location. The walkways and decks are <br /> being replaced due to the deterioration of the existing railroad ties. <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to <br /> it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting <br /> the variance will not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire <br /> hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a <br /> convenience to the applicants,but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship <br /> or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; <br /> and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and <br /> Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> 6. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission,reports by City Staff, comments by <br /> the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br /> welfare of the community. <br /> CONCLUSIONS, ORDER,AND CONDITIONS <br /> Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants <br /> variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.