My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-10-1986 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1986
>
03-10-1986 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/22/2025 10:10:52 AM
Creation date
12/22/2025 9:56:18 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
435
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of OR ONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. <br />A) The property is 's,840 square feet in area or 0.39 <br />ref. nas an average Ldth of approximately 1)0 fret, and <br />ontal-:s an existing house which extends approximately 20 <br />feet into the 75' lakeshore setback zone, and contains on <br />existing detached garage and concrete ,pion which encroach <br />into the minimum required side and street setbacks. <br />B) The applicant proposes to remove certain items of <br />existing hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback area so <br />that teje net increase in 0-75' hardcover is 50 square feet <br />or 0.- %. <br />C) The attached garage and necessary dri aeway and backup <br />apron can be constructed such that hardcover will not exceed <br />30% in the 7'1-250' setback 7(ine. <br />D) The existing non -conforming garage will L,.- removed and <br />the proposed attached garage will meet the required street <br />and side lot line setbacks. <br />4. The <br />applicant rias proposed a driveway <br />configuration <br />that will <br />allow a <br />net: decrease of 0.5% harc <br />;er in <br />the 75-250' <br />zone, but <br />does net <br />allow for 3 backuc: aprr <br />'he <br />Council finds <br />that for <br />safety <br />purposes, a backup apron; <br />.(-);Ild <br />be provided <br />to avoid <br />forcing <br />vehicles to t.:ack onto aunty <br />Road <br />19. <br />5. The City Council has considered this application including <br />the findings and recommendations of tLe P?annir.g Comm ss;on, <br />repor`s by City staff, comm.�nts by the applica:t anf., the effect <br />of the proposed variance on tt.e health, betety and welfar. ,s the <br />community. <br />6. The City Counci 1 f inds that the conditions existing on this <br />property are peculiar to it and do not apply Generally to other <br />property in this zoning district; that granting the variance <br />woul:i not adversely aff<..t triffic conditi )ns, li.yht, air nor <br />rose a fire hazard or other dar'-er to ne.ighborir,g property; woi:ld <br />not werely serve, as a convenie ce to the applicant, but. is <br />necessary to a'le. late a demonstinble hardship or difficulty; is <br />necessary to preserve a-uhstantial property right of the <br />applicant; rrd would be ire keeping with she spirit F.-to itent. of <br />t.l:e Zoninq Code and Comprehensive !'Ian of the City. <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.