Laserfiche WebLink
City of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. <br />3) 'tract E, the developed lot is also deficient in regards <br />to lot area r-equircu.ents as follows: <br />Tract E's area exclusive of road easement per Section <br />31.204 is 1.4 acres - short 26,136 sf or 30% <br />4) Combined Tracts C & D, R.L.S. 96 and combined Tract E & F, <br />R.L.S. 96 have been owned in common by Anderson from May 23, <br />19-56 to the p_est:nt. <br />5) Tracts C, D, E, and F were owned in common by Sam Houston <br />Huffman and 1'lorence A: %jaret Huffman since October 14, <br />19,52 at the time of the replatr_ing of Lot 4 and 4A Auditor's <br />S.abr'ivision N imber 336. <br />6) Vacant Tracts C and D are used as la -en area and additional <br />lake access for the existing residence on combined Tracts <br />E cand F. with tits use a -id with the lots in cormnon ownership, <br />the `our lot: meet all the District zoning requirements. <br />7) A new home on 'tract C would require an additional curb cut <br />:n a section of Shoreline Drive that is heavily trafficked <br />and already has an exce_, live number of accesses serving <br />sting houses. <br />3) 9oth Tracts C an_` E have been zoned for a minimum lot <br />zize of 2 acres 3inc;e Ordinance No. 112 in 1974 at which <br />time: the two lots ere held in common ownership by Alden <br />I.. Anderson aAn-A ,ielen i•1. Anderson and which lots combined <br />met the requirements of this zoning density. <br />9) Denial of `h subject variances would not constitu*P a taking <br />of property or loss of ,ubstantial value be::ause Tract C has <br />always had value and been used as required area and yard <br />space for the residence on Tract E. <br />10) Section 31.203 of the zoning code provides for detveloptrenL <br />�)f lots of r•�cord of greater than or,:-� acre held ' n separate <br />ownership since prior to the eff�'�ti�.�e gate of the zoning <br />rr,-g.:lations. Tracts C: and t) do not conform to this section <br />ueCaLse tttey were in connrn ownership with Tracts E an(i F <br />since 1974 to the present.. <br />li) 'rhe City Cjuncil has always required that when two or more <br />lots are owned in common, each lot must individually meet <br />or exceed the requirements of the Zoning Code before any <br />of the lots can be built upon and that two, or more substandard <br />louts -)wned in common must be combined so that the resulting <br />combined Pit meets 1-he requirements of the Zonin3 Code before <br />the lots can be l:ui'_t <br />