My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-13-1986 - Agenda Packet City Council - city council (4)
Orono
>
City Council
>
1986
>
01-13-1986 - Agenda Packet City Council - city council (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 10:57:01 AM
Creation date
12/18/2025 9:53:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet City Council
Section
City Council
Subject
city council
Document Date
1/13/1986
Retention
After
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETJNG HELD NOVEMBER 18, 1985. PAGE. 3 <br />i987 BAUMAN continued <br />Mr. Bauman states] that tie felt that the proposed plan <br />conforms with the average setback based on all the area <br />properties. <br />Assistant Zoning Administratc- saffron poi. _ed out that the <br />average setback is determined by the two adjacent properties <br />only and, as shown in Exhibit E, uoes not conform with the <br />average setback. <br />Gertrude Noelting, 1060 Tonkawa Road, .gas present and stated <br />the proposed pool would be "ugly" from an outside view and <br />felt it would diminish the value of her property. She stated <br />that there is space to place the pool in another area. <br />Marge Gasch, 1030 Tonkawa Road, was present and stated the <br />pool would encroach upon their sight line and would effect <br />their property value. She invited the Planning Commissior, <br />to visit her home to view the sight problem. <br />Taylor stated an aesthetic landscape plan s:â–ºould be <br />submitted. <br />Chairman Callahan stated that elevation plan should also be <br />submitted. <br />Commission discussed various options for placement of deck <br />and pool building. <br />The Commission generally felt that the hardcover trade-off <br />variance would riot be a problem. <br />There were no other persons present to speak on this matter <br />and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Chairman Callahan seconded by Goetten, to <br />table this matter pt-!nding landsc,-pe, site, pool building, <br />and elevation plans. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />#988 JAMES E. MERTES <br />3237 CA SCO CIRCLE <br />VARIANCE <br />PUBLIC HEARING 8:52 - 9:15 <br />Jim and Ruthmar.y Mertes were present for this matter. <br />Chairman Callahan explained the request for renewal of a lot <br />width and lot area variance, which was previosly granted tc <br />owner; Douglas Smith, in February1984 per Resolution#1607. <br />Doug Smith was present for this matter and stt..ted that the <br />applicant's, Mr. 6 Mrs. James Mertes, bought this property <br />contingent upon renewal of these variances. <br />Jane b Jack Remien, 3235 Casco Circle, were present for this <br />matter. Jane Remien :Mated that they were unhappy about <br />this because the lot is too small, as is their lr.-t. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.