Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #935 <br />July 12, 1985 <br />Page 2 <br />No actual d(.- sign plans for the pond itself have been submitted, <br />and the City Engineer has not viewed the site. A recommendation for <br />approval should be conc;;ti- ed on the City rngineer's review and <br />approval. Interestingly, the complainant called today and witndrew <br />the cc -plaint, roting that their concernE no long exist. (Complainant <br />wishes to remain anonym -;us.) <br />You have in your packet a copy of the overall relandscapir_g plans <br />for this golf course. Staff suggested that the applicant bring these <br />in sc that a "blanket" a,-proval could be given for the individual <br />small projects, which include extending certain tees, tree planting, <br />and creatin; or rearran ng sand traps. While some of these projects <br />involve hauling dirt at_,und, notie would have a significant effect on <br />the watershed, there are n.. o-iditional ponds to be built, and no <br />designated wetlands invcl,.&d. Staff would suggest you recommend <br />granting the conditional use permit for the pond and the other pro- <br />jects, and that applicant be required to obtain a grading perm:'' -,ach <br />spring for the projects to be completed each year. This affor , the <br />City some knowle3ge of what earth moving projects are underway while <br />not hindering the applicant. <br />