My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-09-1985 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1985
>
12-09-1985 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2025 11:37:37 AM
Creation date
12/12/2025 11:27:22 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
344
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE. PALANNING COMMIS;,;ON MEETING HELD NOVEMBE:R 1.8, 1985. PAGE 3 <br />Mr. Bauman stated that he felt that the proposed plan <br />conforms with the average setback based on all the area <br />properties. <br />As-,stant Zoning Adntini..trator Gaffr..i pointed out that the <br />av, age setback is determined by the two adjacent properties <br />only and, as shown in Exhibit E, does not conform with the <br />average setback. <br />Gertrude Noelting, 1060 Tonkawa Road, was present and stated <br />the proposed pool would be "ugly" from an outside view and <br />felt it would diminish the value of her property. She stated <br />that there is space -to place the pool in another area. <br />Marge Gasch, 1030 Tonkawa Road, was present and stated the <br />pool wou 0 encroach upon their sight line and would effect <br />their prop erty value. She invited the Planning Comirklssion <br />to visit her home to view the sight problem. <br />Taylor stated an aesthetic landscape plan should be <br />submitted. <br />Chairman Callahan stated that elevation plan should also be <br />submitted. <br />Commission discussed various options for placement of deck <br />and pool bu:'.lding. <br />The Commission generally felt that the haracover trade-c <br />variance wou' -' not be a problem. <br />"'here were n.. cher persons present to speak on this matter <br />dr.i the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Chairman Callahan, seconded b• ttcn, to <br />tab'e this matter pending landscape, site, F. ilding, <br />and elevation plans. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays <br />!+b.. JAMES E. 14ERTES <br />CASCO CIRCLE <br />VARIANCE <br />PUBLIC HEARING 8:52 - 9:15 <br />Jim and P,uLhmary Mertes were present. for this matter. <br />C' .iirman Callahan explained the request f.r renewal of s lot <br />w. dth and lot are& variance, which was previosly granted to <br />nr, Douglas Smith, in February 1984 per Resoli.;tion i1607. <br />Doug Smith was present for this matter and st that the <br />applicant's, Mr. & Mrs. James Mertes, bought t property <br />contingent upon renewal of these variances. <br />Jane & Ja^k Remien, 3235 Casco Circle, were present for this <br />:natter. Jane Remien stated that they were unhappy about <br />this because the lot is too small, as is their lot. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.