Laserfiche WebLink
jL , 1 l.asco (.lrcl t. <br />Variance <br />Paqe 2 <br />2) To act on the variance application for a lot of <br />separate record per the staff survey of <br />vacant lokeshore lots held either in common <br />ownership -)r separate ownership based on the <br />following :' _.idings: <br />a) staff accepted the application believing <br />it was merely for a lot arer, and width <br />variance. <br />b) Thy. proposed development of Lot 18 as a <br />single residential unit is consistent with <br />surrounding pattern of neighborhood <br />development. <br />c) The proposed application does not require <br />any variances. <br />d) Existing garage should be noted as a non- <br />conforming structur, and subject to all <br />pertinent ordinance. <br />3) To deny the 1.-)t area and lot width variance <br />application finding Lot 18, originally held in <br />com,,nc i ownership with Lots 16 and 17 prior to <br />1971, does meet the required 100% of all <br />lot stand,. c of the I,R-IC zoning district. <br />This - a difficult one for both staff and Plai.,,,inrj Commission. <br />I mould strongly suggest you go with option 1 and push for <br />rest, iition of the corrn,on ownership issue. <br />