My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-12-1985 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1985
>
11-12-1985 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2025 10:10:29 AM
Creation date
12/11/2025 10:01:19 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
279
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
(' i ty of UOI'iTO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCII <br />NO. <br />A RESOLUTION ur(ANTING <br />A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE. <br />SECTION 10.20, SUBDIVISION 3 (K) <br />FILE 1976 <br />WHEREAS, Calvin Charles Korth (hereinafter "the applicant") has <br />an interest in the property located at 3615 '.yric Avenue within the City of <br />Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as Lot 10, Block 3, <br />Navarro (hereinafter "property"); and <br />WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for a <br />Conditional Use Permit to keep a pigmy goat within his residence per <br />Municipal Zoning Code Section :_0.20, Subdivision 3 W. <br />Minnesota: <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, <br />FINDINGS <br />1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #976. <br />2. The property is located in the LR-lC-1 Lakeshore Sub -District. <br />3. O- October 21, 1985, the Orono Planning Commission reviewed the <br />application as proposed and recommended approval based on the <br />following findings: <br />A) The goat is maintained as a house pet and not as a farm <br />animal. The goat is maintained within applicant's residence. <br />B) Area requirements per Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (K) are <br />not applicable as goat is kept within residence and goat does not <br />require grazing area for food. <br />C) Surrounding neighbors and most affected neighbors have all <br />submitted written statements arproving the keeping of the goat as <br />proposed by applicant. <br />D) Dr. Paiiee of the Cedar Pet Clinic, and Dr. Bill DeBold, of <br />the University of Minnesota's Large Animal Clinic, confirm that <br />the pet goat does not requite special vaccinations or innocuiLl- <br />tions. The keeping of the goat will create no potential health <br />threats for neiqhborhood or surrounding community. <br />4. The City Council has considered this application including the <br />findings and recommendations of the Planring Commission, reports by <br />staff and the oral and written comments of he applicant and the <br />effect of the proposed use on the health, safety and welfare of the <br />community. <br />Page 1 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.